PQNCX vs. ANNPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PQNCX (Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund) and ANNPX (Virtus Convertible Fund) are both mutual funds - PQNCX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Allianz, while ANNPX is a Convertible Bonds fund managed by Allianz. Over the past 10 years, PQNCX returned 8.53%/yr vs 14.66%/yr for ANNPX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQNCX charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for ANNPX.

Performance

PQNCX vs. ANNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQNCX achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly lower than ANNPX's 22.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PQNCX has underperformed ANNPX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while ANNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.

PQNCX

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 1.85%
• YTD: 13.61%
• 6M: 11.25%
• 1Y: 21.17%
• 3Y*: 8.75%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 8.53%

ANNPX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 22.11%
• 6M: 20.06%
• 1Y: 44.39%
• 3Y*: 20.71%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: 14.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQNCX vs. ANNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQNCX Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund	13.61%	4.52%	2.69%	15.19%	-13.05%	24.95%	0.19%	28.03%	-16.89%	25.41%
ANNPX Virtus Convertible Fund	22.11%	22.50%	14.13%	8.39%	-18.65%	4.96%	55.99%	26.45%	2.76%	15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PQNCX and ANNPX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 1993	0.77

The correlation between PQNCX and ANNPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PQNCX vs. ANNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQNCX

PQNCX Risk / Return Rank: 30
PQNCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PQNCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
PQNCX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PQNCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PQNCX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

ANNPX

ANNPX Risk / Return Rank: 92
ANNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ANNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ANNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ANNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ANNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQNCX vs. ANNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PQNCX	ANNPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	3.04	-1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	3.87	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.53	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	6.26	-4.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.98	26.09	-19.11

PQNCX vs. ANNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQNCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the ANNPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQNCX and ANNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PQNCX vs. ANNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQNCX drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, which is greater than ANNPX's maximum drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQNCX and ANNPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQNCX	ANNPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.51%	-55.61%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.73%	-7.15%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.61%	-13.67%	-5.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.00%	-26.85%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.52%	-27.36%	-15.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	0.00%	-1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.47%	-17.43%	+9.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	1.71%	+1.33%

Volatility

PQNCX vs. ANNPX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) have volatilities of 5.41% and 5.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQNCX	ANNPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	5.60%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	12.12%	-1.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.57%	14.75%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.96%	13.00%	+5.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.68%	13.67%	+6.01%

PQNCX vs. ANNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQNCX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ANNPX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQNCX vs. ANNPX - Dividend Comparison

PQNCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, less than ANNPX's 9.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANNPX Virtus Convertible Fund	9.03%	11.32%	2.31%	2.56%	1.55%	20.74%	6.94%	5.12%	18.79%	23.47%	2.88%	10.63%
PQNCX Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund	7.10%	8.07%	1.99%	9.82%	39.90%	14.94%	0.35%	10.06%	0.01%	10.70%	0.92%	4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQNCX and ANNPX in my portfolio?

PQNCX and ANNPX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PQNCX or ANNPX?

ANNPX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to PQNCX (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQNCX dropped -59.51% vs ANNPX's -55.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.