PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQNCX vs. AZNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQNCX vs. AZNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) and Virtus Income & Growth Fund (AZNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQNCX achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than AZNIX's 10.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PQNCX has underperformed AZNIX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while AZNIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.


PQNCX

1D
0.89%
1M
1.85%
YTD
13.61%
6M
11.25%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
8.53%

AZNIX

1D
0.86%
1M
1.87%
YTD
10.28%
6M
9.75%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQNCX vs. AZNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQNCX
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund
13.61%4.52%2.69%15.19%-13.05%24.95%0.19%28.03%-16.89%25.41%
AZNIX
Virtus Income & Growth Fund
10.28%11.97%11.24%18.99%-19.58%11.81%23.37%20.81%-5.56%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PQNCX and AZNIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2007

0.85

The correlation between PQNCX and AZNIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQNCX vs. AZNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQNCX
PQNCX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PQNCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQNCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQNCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PQNCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQNCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AZNIX
AZNIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AZNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AZNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQNCX vs. AZNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) and Virtus Income & Growth Fund (AZNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQNCXAZNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.36

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.98

15.77

-8.79

PQNCX vs. AZNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQNCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the AZNIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQNCX and AZNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQNCX vs. AZNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQNCX drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, which is greater than AZNIX's maximum drawdown of -45.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQNCX and AZNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQNCXAZNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.51%

-45.11%

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

-6.16%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.61%

-10.59%

-9.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.00%

-23.92%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.52%

-26.24%

-16.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.13%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-5.89%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

1.31%

+1.73%

Volatility

PQNCX vs. AZNIX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Virtus Income & Growth Fund (AZNIX) at 3.77%. This indicates that PQNCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AZNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQNCXAZNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

3.77%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

7.86%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

9.26%

+6.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.96%

10.83%

+8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

11.44%

+8.24%

PQNCX vs. AZNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQNCX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AZNIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQNCX vs. AZNIX - Dividend Comparison

PQNCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, more than AZNIX's 6.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZNIX
Virtus Income & Growth Fund
6.57%7.00%7.29%7.49%8.26%6.21%6.59%8.18%7.22%7.82%8.94%9.33%
PQNCX
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund
7.10%8.07%1.99%9.82%39.90%14.94%0.35%10.06%0.01%10.70%0.92%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQNCX and AZNIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PQNCX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to AZNIX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQNCX dropped -59.51% vs AZNIX's -45.11%.

AZNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQNCX and AZNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer