ANNPX vs. VEA
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA).
ANNPX is managed by Allianz. It was launched on Apr 18, 1993. VEA is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. It was launched on Jul 20, 2007.
Performance
ANNPX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ANNPX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANNPX Virtus Convertible Fund | 2.37% | 22.50% | 14.13% | 8.39% | -18.65% | 4.96% | 55.99% | 26.45% | 2.76% | 15.22% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 4.45% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANNPX achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 4.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ANNPX has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 12.90%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.55% annualized return.
ANNPX
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
VEA
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- 31.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANNPX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANNPX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ANNPX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
ANNPX
VEA
ANNPX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANNPX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | 1.81 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 2.46 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 2.77 | +1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.22 | 10.77 | +5.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANNPX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.81 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.55 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | 0.55 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.22 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between ANNPX and VEA is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ANNPX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
ANNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.00%, more than VEA's 2.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANNPX Virtus Convertible Fund | 11.00% | 11.32% | 2.31% | 2.56% | 1.55% | 20.74% | 6.94% | 5.12% | 18.79% | 23.47% | 2.88% | 10.63% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.88% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
ANNPX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANNPX drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANNPX and VEA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANNPX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -60.68% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -11.63% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.85% | -29.71% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.36% | -35.73% | +8.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.76% | -7.20% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.54% | -13.39% | -4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 2.99% | -1.18% |
Volatility
ANNPX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) is 6.71%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that ANNPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ANNPX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 7.92% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 11.68% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 17.67% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 16.30% | -3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 17.26% | -3.79% |