PQNCX vs. DRGTX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PQNCX (Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund) and DRGTX (Virtus Technology Fund) are both mutual funds - PQNCX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Allianz, while DRGTX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Allianz. Over the past 10 years, PQNCX returned 8.83%/yr vs 23.59%/yr for DRGTX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQNCX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for DRGTX.

Performance

PQNCX vs. DRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) and Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQNCX achieves a 13.08% return, which is significantly lower than DRGTX's 21.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PQNCX has underperformed DRGTX with an annualized return of 8.83%, while DRGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.59% annualized return.

PQNCX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 13.08%
• 6M: 10.80%
• 1Y: 18.40%
• 3Y*: 10.10%
• 5Y*: 5.78%
• 10Y*: 8.83%

DRGTX

• 1D: -3.89%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 21.65%
• 6M: 19.74%
• 1Y: 42.66%
• 3Y*: 32.94%
• 5Y*: 15.60%
• 10Y*: 23.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQNCX vs. DRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQNCX Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund	13.08%	4.52%	2.69%	15.19%	-13.05%	24.95%	0.19%	28.03%	-16.89%	25.41%
DRGTX Virtus Technology Fund	21.65%	25.10%	35.67%	65.59%	-42.58%	12.14%	70.02%	29.46%	5.06%	47.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PQNCX and DRGTX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1995	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between PQNCX and DRGTX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PQNCX vs. DRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQNCX

PQNCX Risk / Return Rank: 30
PQNCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
PQNCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
PQNCX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
PQNCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PQNCX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

DRGTX

DRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 40
DRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
DRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
DRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
DRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQNCX vs. DRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) and Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PQNCX	DRGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.88	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.40	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.32	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	2.20	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.42	6.69	-0.27

PQNCX vs. DRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQNCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the DRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQNCX and DRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PQNCX vs. DRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQNCX drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, smaller than the maximum DRGTX drawdown of -83.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQNCX and DRGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQNCX	DRGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.51%	-83.33%	+23.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.73%	-20.78%	+11.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.61%	-29.46%	+9.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.00%	-49.05%	+25.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.52%	-49.05%	+6.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-7.32%	+5.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.47%	-29.90%	+22.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	6.82%	-3.78%

Volatility

PQNCX vs. DRGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund (PQNCX) is 5.39%, while Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX) has a volatility of 11.91%. This indicates that PQNCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQNCX	DRGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	11.91%	-6.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	19.76%	-8.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.63%	24.42%	-8.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.96%	28.91%	-9.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.64%	27.07%	-7.43%

PQNCX vs. DRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQNCX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGTX's 1.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQNCX vs. DRGTX - Dividend Comparison

PQNCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than DRGTX's 2.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRGTX Virtus Technology Fund	2.06%	2.51%	0.00%	0.00%	18.86%	28.27%	16.84%	17.12%	21.77%	16.26%	5.15%	15.96%
PQNCX Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Fund	7.13%	8.07%	1.99%	9.82%	39.90%	14.94%	0.35%	10.06%	0.01%	10.70%	0.92%	4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQNCX and DRGTX in my portfolio?

PQNCX and DRGTX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PQNCX or DRGTX?

DRGTX has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to PQNCX (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQNCX dropped -59.51% vs DRGTX's -83.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.