PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQDI vs. USMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQDI vs. USMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQDI achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than USMC's 9.11% return.


PQDI

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.02%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.97%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
9.11%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*

USMC

1D
0.11%
1M
5.62%
YTD
9.11%
6M
8.87%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
15.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQDI vs. USMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PQDI
Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF
1.32%8.46%9.99%6.24%-9.61%3.10%9.81%
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
9.11%14.99%29.82%31.57%-17.17%26.30%20.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PQDI and USMC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020

0.50

The correlation between PQDI and USMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

PQDI vs. USMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PQDI
USMC

Financial Services

10.5%
19.6%

Communication Services

0.7%
14.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.6%

Energy

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

5.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

29.1%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

PQDI
10.5%
USMC
19.6%

Communication Services

PQDI
0.7%
USMC
14.7%

Basic Materials

PQDI

-

USMC

-

Consumer Cyclical

PQDI

-

USMC
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

PQDI

-

USMC
9.6%

Energy

PQDI

-

USMC
4.8%

Healthcare

PQDI

-

USMC
8.1%

Industrials

PQDI

-

USMC
5.6%

Real Estate

PQDI

-

USMC

-

Technology

PQDI

-

USMC
29.1%

Utilities

PQDI

-

USMC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQDI vs. USMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQDI
PQDI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PQDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQDI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PQDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

USMC
USMC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
USMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
USMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQDI vs. USMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PQDIUSMCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.10

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.40

2.95

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.37

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.45

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.03

9.38

+0.65

PQDI vs. USMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQDI Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the USMC Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQDI and USMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PQDIUSMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.10

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.96

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.84

+0.19

Drawdowns

PQDI vs. USMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQDI drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, smaller than the maximum USMC drawdown of -29.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQDI and USMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQDIUSMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-29.97%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-10.30%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.31%

-19.12%

+15.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.41%

-24.09%

+6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-4.41%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

2.69%

-1.95%

Volatility

PQDI vs. USMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) is 1.16%, while Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that PQDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQDIUSMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

2.49%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

8.69%

-5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22%

11.81%

-8.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.69%

16.36%

-11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.56%

18.25%

-13.69%

PQDI vs. USMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQDI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than USMC's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQDI vs. USMC - Dividend Comparison

PQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than USMC's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQDI
Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF
5.46%5.02%4.93%5.35%5.60%5.21%2.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
0.74%0.79%1.04%1.35%1.78%1.53%1.55%2.01%2.28%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQDI and USMC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USMC has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to PQDI (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQDI dropped -17.41% vs USMC's -29.97%.

On 5-year performance, USMC leads with 15.68% vs 3.30% for PQDI. On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PQDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USMC has performed better with a 15.68% return vs 3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PQDI.

PQDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 0.74% for USMC.

PQDI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while USMC is Large Cap Growth Equities. PQDI tracks ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index, while USMC tracks Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PQDI and 0.12% for USMC.

PQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQDI and USMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer