PQDI vs. USMC
PQDI (Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF) and USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PQDI is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index, while USMC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PQDI returned 3.30%/yr vs 15.68%/yr for USMC. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PQDI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for USMC.
Performance
PQDI vs. USMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQDI achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than USMC's 9.11% return.
PQDI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- —
USMC
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 24.67%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
PQDI vs. USMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 1.32% | 8.46% | 9.99% | 6.24% | -9.61% | 3.10% | 9.81% |
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 9.11% | 14.99% | 29.82% | 31.57% | -17.17% | 26.30% | 20.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQDI and USMC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between PQDI and USMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
PQDI vs. USMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PQDI
USMC
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PQDI
USMC
Communication Services
PQDI
USMC
Basic Materials
PQDI
-
USMC
-
Consumer Cyclical
PQDI
-
USMC
Consumer Defensive
PQDI
-
USMC
Energy
PQDI
-
USMC
Healthcare
PQDI
-
USMC
Industrials
PQDI
-
USMC
Real Estate
PQDI
-
USMC
-
Technology
PQDI
-
USMC
Utilities
PQDI
-
USMC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQDI vs. USMC — Risk / Return Rank
PQDI
USMC
PQDI vs. USMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQDI | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 2.10 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | 2.95 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.45 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.03 | 9.38 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQDI | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.10 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.96 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.84 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
PQDI vs. USMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQDI drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, smaller than the maximum USMC drawdown of -29.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQDI and USMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQDI | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -29.97% | +12.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -10.30% | +6.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.31% | -19.12% | +15.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.41% | -24.09% | +6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | 0.00% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -4.41% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 2.69% | -1.95% |
Volatility
PQDI vs. USMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) is 1.16%, while Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that PQDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQDI | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 2.49% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 8.69% | -5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 11.81% | -8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 16.36% | -11.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 18.25% | -13.69% |
PQDI vs. USMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQDI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than USMC's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQDI vs. USMC - Dividend Comparison
PQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than USMC's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 5.46% | 5.02% | 4.93% | 5.35% | 5.60% | 5.21% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.78% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.28% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQDI and USMC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMC has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to PQDI (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQDI dropped -17.41% vs USMC's -29.97%.
On 5-year performance, USMC leads with 15.68% vs 3.30% for PQDI. On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PQDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USMC has performed better with a 15.68% return vs 3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PQDI.
PQDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 0.74% for USMC.
PQDI is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while USMC is Large Cap Growth Equities. PQDI tracks ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index, while USMC tracks Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PQDI and 0.12% for USMC.
PQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PQDI and USMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer