PQDI vs. PGF
PQDI (Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF) and PGF (Invesco Financial Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PQDI tracks the ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index while PGF tracks the Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PQDI returned 3.23%/yr vs -0.81%/yr for PGF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQDI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PGF.
Performance
PQDI vs. PGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQDI achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than PGF's -0.31% return.
PQDI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
PGF
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
PQDI vs. PGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 1.19% | 8.46% | 9.99% | 6.24% | -9.61% | 3.10% | 9.81% |
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | -0.31% | 3.40% | 6.01% | 7.73% | -19.22% | 2.65% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQDI and PGF is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PQDI and PGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
PQDI vs. PGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PQDI
PGF
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PQDI
PGF
Communication Services
PQDI
PGF
-
Basic Materials
PQDI
-
PGF
-
Consumer Cyclical
PQDI
-
PGF
-
Consumer Defensive
PQDI
-
PGF
-
Energy
PQDI
-
PGF
-
Healthcare
PQDI
-
PGF
-
Industrials
PQDI
-
PGF
-
Real Estate
PQDI
-
PGF
-
Technology
PQDI
-
PGF
-
Utilities
PQDI
-
PGF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQDI vs. PGF — Risk / Return Rank
PQDI
PGF
PQDI vs. PGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQDI | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 0.74 | +1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.24 | 1.12 | +2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.13 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 0.99 | +1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.67 | 2.11 | +7.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQDI | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 0.74 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | -0.07 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.15 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
PQDI vs. PGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQDI drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, smaller than the maximum PGF drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQDI and PGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQDI | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -75.69% | +58.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -4.69% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.31% | -10.87% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.41% | -23.41% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -5.38% | +4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -7.01% | +3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 2.20% | -1.46% |
Volatility
PQDI vs. PGF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) is 1.07%, while Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that PQDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQDI | PGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.48% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 4.06% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 6.28% | -3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 11.36% | -6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 12.00% | -7.45% |
PQDI vs. PGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQDI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PGF's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQDI vs. PGF - Dividend Comparison
PQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, less than PGF's 6.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | 6.33% | 6.30% | 6.24% | 6.15% | 5.95% | 4.68% | 4.91% | 5.14% | 5.73% | 5.32% | 5.92% | 5.68% |
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 5.46% | 5.02% | 4.93% | 5.35% | 5.60% | 5.21% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQDI and PGF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGF has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to PQDI (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQDI dropped -17.41% vs PGF's -75.69%.
On 5-year performance, PQDI leads with 3.23% vs -0.81% for PGF. On fees, PQDI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PQDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PQDI has performed better with a 3.23% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PQDI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PGF.
PGF has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 5.46% for PQDI.
PQDI tracks ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index, while PGF tracks Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PQDI and 0.62% for PGF.
PQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PQDI and PGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer