PQDI vs. PFLD
PQDI (Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF) and PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PQDI tracks the ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index while PFLD tracks the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PQDI returned 3.30%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PFLD. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQDI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFLD.
Performance
PQDI vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQDI achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than PFLD's 2.63% return.
PQDI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- —
PFLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- —
PQDI vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 1.32% | 8.46% | 9.99% | 6.24% | -9.61% | 3.10% | 9.81% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 2.63% | 1.44% | 5.48% | 8.16% | -12.73% | 4.49% | 9.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQDI and PFLD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between PQDI and PFLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PQDI vs. PFLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PQDI
PFLD
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PQDI
PFLD
-
Communication Services
PQDI
PFLD
-
Basic Materials
PQDI
-
PFLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
PQDI
-
PFLD
-
Consumer Defensive
PQDI
-
PFLD
-
Energy
PQDI
-
PFLD
-
Healthcare
PQDI
-
PFLD
-
Industrials
PQDI
-
PFLD
-
Real Estate
PQDI
-
PFLD
-
Technology
PQDI
-
PFLD
-
Utilities
PQDI
-
PFLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQDI vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank
PQDI
PFLD
PQDI vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQDI | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 1.83 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | 2.99 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.35 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.60 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.03 | 11.57 | -1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQDI | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 1.83 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.14 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.17 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
PQDI vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQDI drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, smaller than the maximum PFLD drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQDI and PFLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQDI | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -33.20% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -2.23% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.31% | -6.41% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.41% | -15.51% | -1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | 0.00% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -4.18% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 0.50% | +0.24% |
Volatility
PQDI vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison
Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 0.89%. This indicates that PQDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQDI | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 0.89% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 2.26% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 3.42% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 7.50% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 13.38% | -8.82% |
PQDI vs. PFLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQDI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PFLD's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQDI vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison
PQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, less than PFLD's 5.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 5.60% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% |
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 5.46% | 5.02% | 4.93% | 5.35% | 5.60% | 5.21% | 2.69% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQDI and PFLD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PQDI has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to PFLD (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQDI dropped -17.41% vs PFLD's -33.20%.
On 5-year performance, PQDI leads with 3.30% vs 1.04% for PFLD. On fees, PFLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PQDI has performed better with a 3.30% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PQDI.
PFLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 5.46% for PQDI.
PQDI tracks ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index, while PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Advisors Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PQDI and 0.45% for PFLD.
PQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PQDI and PFLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer