PQCCX vs. RSINX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PQCCX (PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund) and RSINX (Victory RS Investors Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PQCCX returned 13.50%/yr vs 11.69%/yr for RSINX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PQCCX charges 0.81%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for RSINX.

Performance

PQCCX vs. RSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PQCCX having a 14.53% return and RSINX slightly lower at 14.37%.

PQCCX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -0.97%
• 6M: 10.17%
• YTD: 14.53%
• 1Y: 22.65%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.69%

RSINX

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 4.78%
• 6M: 10.55%
• YTD: 14.37%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: 10.87%
• ALL TIME*: 8.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PQCCX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RSINX Victory RS Investors Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PQCCX vs. RSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQCCX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund	14.53%	7.08%	37.16%	18.91%	-10.54%	28.16%	3.01%	24.76%	-15.38%	15.48%
RSINX Victory RS Investors Fund	14.37%	6.39%	20.81%	13.18%	-2.02%	25.73%	-1.68%	28.02%	-9.55%	16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PQCCX and RSINX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.87

The correlation between PQCCX and RSINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PQCCX vs. RSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PQCCX

PQCCX Risk / Return Rank: 48
PQCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
PQCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
PQCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PQCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PQCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

RSINX

RSINX Risk / Return Rank: 73
RSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PQCCX vs. RSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PQCCX	RSINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.74	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	2.57	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.30	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	2.42	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.01	8.76	-0.75

PQCCX vs. RSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the RSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQCCX and RSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PQCCX vs. RSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.27%, smaller than the maximum RSINX drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCCX and RSINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQCCX	RSINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.27%	-66.11%	+20.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-8.64%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.53%	-20.23%	-14.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.53%	-23.08%	-11.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	0.00%	-2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-10.49%	+2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	2.39%	+0.07%

Volatility

PQCCX vs. RSINX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQCCX	RSINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	3.43%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.65%	8.15%	+3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.77%	12.03%	+3.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.55%	18.99%	+9.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.59%	19.06%	+7.53%

PQCCX vs. RSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQCCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than RSINX's 1.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQCCX vs. RSINX - Dividend Comparison

PQCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than RSINX's 3.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQCCX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund	3.09%	3.54%	38.85%	7.15%	17.18%	26.66%	0.71%	1.00%	7.37%	2.85%
RSINX Victory RS Investors Fund	3.90%	4.46%	10.21%	0.77%	4.03%	15.89%	0.30%	4.32%	17.89%	14.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQCCX and RSINX in my portfolio?

PQCCX and RSINX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PQCCX or RSINX?

PQCCX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to RSINX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQCCX dropped -45.27% vs RSINX's -66.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.