PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQCCX vs. BTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQCCX vs. BTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQCCX achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than BTMFX's 2.05% return.


PQCCX

1D
1.16%
1M
3.28%
YTD
15.24%
6M
12.84%
1Y
26.74%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*

BTMFX

1D
0.64%
1M
0.77%
YTD
2.05%
6M
0.69%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQCCX vs. BTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQCCX
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund
15.24%7.08%37.16%18.91%-10.54%28.16%3.01%24.76%-15.38%15.48%
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
2.05%4.29%10.27%13.06%-10.91%24.77%9.72%33.00%-3.36%20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PQCCX and BTMFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.90

The correlation between PQCCX and BTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQCCX vs. BTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQCCX
PQCCX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PQCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PQCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BTMFX
BTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQCCX vs. BTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQCCXBTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.12

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

1.00

+2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.05

2.75

+8.31

PQCCX vs. BTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the BTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQCCX and BTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQCCX vs. BTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.27%, smaller than the maximum BTMFX drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCCX and BTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQCCXBTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.27%

-49.26%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-7.79%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.53%

-17.77%

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.53%

-20.79%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-2.42%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-6.15%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.83%

-0.39%

Volatility

PQCCX vs. BTMFX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX) at 3.28%. This indicates that PQCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQCCXBTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

3.28%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.77%

8.18%

+3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

11.90%

+3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.64%

15.76%

+12.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.72%

17.44%

+9.28%

PQCCX vs. BTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQCCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than BTMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQCCX vs. BTMFX - Dividend Comparison

PQCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than BTMFX's 10.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
10.64%10.86%4.23%4.41%4.71%4.91%1.98%6.95%5.96%6.61%7.03%6.60%
PQCCX
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund
3.07%3.54%38.85%7.15%17.18%26.66%0.71%1.00%7.37%2.85%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQCCX and BTMFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PQCCX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to BTMFX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQCCX dropped -45.27% vs BTMFX's -49.26%.

PQCCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQCCX and BTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer