PQCCX vs. DNLDX
PQCCX (PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund) and DNLDX (BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PQCCX returned 13.50%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for DNLDX. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PQCCX charges 0.81%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for DNLDX.
Performance
PQCCX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PQCCX having a 14.53% return and DNLDX slightly higher at 15.00%.
PQCCX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 22.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.69%
DNLDX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 21.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PQCCX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQCCX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund | 14.53% | 7.08% | 37.16% | 18.91% | -10.54% | 28.16% | 3.01% | 24.76% | -15.38% | 15.48% |
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 15.00% | 9.79% | 22.27% | 16.99% | -14.34% | 26.49% | 9.29% | 16.82% | -14.46% | 16.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQCCX and DNLDX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PQCCX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQCCX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank
PQCCX
DNLDX
PQCCX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PQCCX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.61 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 9.77 | -1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PQCCX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.27%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCCX and DNLDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQCCX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.27% | -63.69% | +18.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -7.29% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.53% | -20.42% | -14.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.53% | -23.42% | -11.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -0.65% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -9.60% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 1.95% | +0.51% |
Volatility
PQCCX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) at 2.77%. This indicates that PQCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQCCX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 2.77% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 10.01% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 13.48% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.55% | 18.50% | +10.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 19.46% | +7.13% |
PQCCX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQCCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQCCX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison
PQCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than DNLDX's 13.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 13.06% | 14.15% | 15.24% | 1.69% | 8.82% | 17.74% | 2.77% | 2.65% | 11.14% | 11.32% | 1.00% | 3.12% |
PQCCX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund | 3.09% | 3.54% | 38.85% | 7.15% | 17.18% | 26.66% | 0.71% | 1.00% | 7.37% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, PQCCX and DNLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PQCCX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to DNLDX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQCCX dropped -45.27% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.
DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PQCCX and DNLDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer