PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQCCX vs. PFSLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQCCX vs. PFSLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQCCX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly lower than PFSLX's 47.16% return.


PQCCX

1D
-0.87%
1M
1.87%
6M
16.16%
YTD
16.16%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
22.99%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*

PFSLX

1D
-2.19%
1M
3.38%
6M
47.16%
YTD
47.16%
1Y
73.99%
3Y*
27.68%
5Y*
14.65%
10Y*
17.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQCCX vs. PFSLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQCCX
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund
16.16%7.08%37.16%18.91%-10.54%28.16%3.01%24.76%-15.38%15.48%
PFSLX
Paradigm Select Fund
47.16%13.27%16.73%26.94%-26.44%31.16%26.05%38.32%-9.93%16.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PQCCX and PFSLX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.89

The correlation between PQCCX and PFSLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQCCX vs. PFSLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQCCX
PQCCX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PQCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PQCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PFSLX
PFSLX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PFSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQCCX vs. PFSLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQCCXPFSLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

6.98

-4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

26.66

-17.17

PQCCX vs. PFSLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the PFSLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQCCX and PFSLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQCCX vs. PFSLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.27%, smaller than the maximum PFSLX drawdown of -91.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCCX and PFSLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQCCXPFSLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.27%

-91.83%

+46.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-10.91%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.53%

-91.83%

+57.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.53%

-91.83%

+57.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-82.19%

+81.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-13.98%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.85%

-0.41%

Volatility

PQCCX vs. PFSLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) is 4.74%, while Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) has a volatility of 11.85%. This indicates that PQCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFSLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQCCXPFSLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

11.85%

-7.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

21.54%

-9.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

26.55%

-10.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.63%

146.13%

-117.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.68%

104.47%

-77.79%

PQCCX vs. PFSLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQCCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than PFSLX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQCCX vs. PFSLX - Dividend Comparison

PQCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than PFSLX's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFSLX
Paradigm Select Fund
0.10%0.14%0.02%0.31%0.01%0.17%0.11%0.58%2.93%3.89%0.74%9.40%
PQCCX
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund
3.04%3.54%38.85%7.15%17.18%26.66%0.71%1.00%7.37%2.85%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQCCX and PFSLX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSLX has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to PQCCX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQCCX dropped -45.27% vs PFSLX's -91.83%.

PFSLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQCCX and PFSLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer