PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSLX vs. SCHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSLX vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSLX achieves a 37.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCHM's 16.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PFSLX has outperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 16.06%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.84% annualized return.


PFSLX

1D
3.21%
1M
-4.09%
6M
30.28%
YTD
37.13%
1Y
68.31%
3Y*
23.63%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
16.06%
ALL TIME*
11.75%

SCHM

1D
-0.26%
1M
-3.53%
6M
10.34%
YTD
16.02%
1Y
25.02%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
10.84%
ALL TIME*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$34.02M$31.86M$37.33M

PFSLX vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFSLX
Paradigm Select Fund
37.13%13.27%16.73%26.94%-26.44%31.16%26.05%38.32%-9.93%16.13%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
16.02%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSLX and SCHM is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.91

The correlation between PFSLX and SCHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSLX vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFSLX
PFSLX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PFSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFSLX vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFSLXSCHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.34

2.49

+2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

8.79

+8.63

PFSLX vs. SCHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the SCHM Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSLX and SCHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFSLX vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSLX drawdown since its inception was -91.83%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSLX and SCHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSLXSCHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.83%

-42.43%

-49.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.69%

-9.32%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.83%

-23.27%

-68.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.83%

-26.46%

-65.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.83%

-42.43%

-49.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.40%

-5.89%

-77.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.23%

-5.63%

-8.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.64%

+0.96%

Volatility

PFSLX vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison

Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) at 4.50%. This indicates that PFSLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSLXSCHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

4.50%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.19%

13.07%

+9.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.18%

16.71%

+10.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.15%

19.68%

+126.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.47%

20.49%

+83.98%

PFSLX vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSLX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSLX vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

PFSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SCHM's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFSLX
Paradigm Select Fund
0.10%0.14%0.02%0.31%0.01%0.17%0.11%0.58%2.93%3.89%0.74%9.40%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.27%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSLX and SCHM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSLX has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to SCHM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSLX dropped -91.83% vs SCHM's -42.43%.

PFSLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSLX and SCHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer