PQCCX vs. FZAMX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

PQCCX (PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund) and FZAMX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PQCCX returned 13.88%/yr vs 12.12%/yr for FZAMX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PQCCX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FZAMX.

Performance

PQCCX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQCCX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 26.92% return.

PQCCX

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 1.87%
• 6M: 16.16%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 1Y: 21.82%
• 3Y*: 22.99%
• 5Y*: 13.88%
• 10Y*: —

FZAMX

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 4.40%
• 6M: 26.92%
• YTD: 26.92%
• 1Y: 38.53%
• 3Y*: 21.08%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: 13.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQCCX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQCCX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund	16.16%	7.08%	37.16%	18.91%	-10.54%	28.16%	3.01%	24.76%	-15.38%	15.48%
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	26.92%	12.00%	17.39%	15.15%	-14.70%	25.40%	18.84%	23.85%	-14.85%	20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PQCCX and FZAMX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.96

The correlation between PQCCX and FZAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PQCCX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQCCX

PQCCX Risk / Return Rank: 50
PQCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PQCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PQCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PQCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PQCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FZAMX

FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQCCX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PQCCX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	2.23	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.04	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.38	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	4.07	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.49	16.26	-6.76

PQCCX vs. FZAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the FZAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQCCX and FZAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PQCCX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.27%, which is greater than FZAMX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCCX and FZAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQCCX	FZAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.27%	-42.32%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-9.77%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.53%	-25.24%	-9.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.53%	-25.24%	-9.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-1.33%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-6.05%	-1.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.44%	0.00%

Volatility

PQCCX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQCCX) is 4.74%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that PQCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQCCX	FZAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	6.13%	-1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.82%	14.38%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.86%	17.83%	-1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.63%	20.32%	+8.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.68%	20.89%	+5.79%

PQCCX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQCCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQCCX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison

PQCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than FZAMX's 5.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	5.55%	10.09%	6.93%	2.83%	5.86%	18.58%	1.41%	3.50%	10.72%	7.81%	5.00%	4.90%
PQCCX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund	3.04%	3.54%	38.85%	7.15%	17.18%	26.66%	0.71%	1.00%	7.37%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQCCX and FZAMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, PQCCX and FZAMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PQCCX or FZAMX?

FZAMX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to PQCCX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQCCX dropped -45.27% vs FZAMX's -42.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.