PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAMX vs. FZILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAMX achieves a 21.69% return, which is significantly higher than FZILX's 14.05% return.


FZAMX

1D
1.77%
1M
-2.80%
6M
15.92%
YTD
21.69%
1Y
34.39%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
12.19%
ALL TIME*
11.23%

FZILX

1D
2.82%
1M
0.36%
6M
7.76%
YTD
14.05%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FZAMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z
21.69%12.00%17.39%15.15%-14.70%25.40%18.84%23.85%-17.88%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
14.05%33.52%5.32%16.28%-15.96%8.19%11.06%21.69%-9.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAMX and FZILX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.77

The correlation between FZAMX and FZILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAMX vs. FZILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FZAMX
FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FZILX
FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZAMXFZILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.51

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.76

9.35

+2.41

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FZILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAMX and FZILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAMX drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, which is greater than FZILX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAMX and FZILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAMXFZILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.32%

-34.37%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-11.24%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.24%

-13.47%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-29.87%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.39%

-2.15%

-3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-6.61%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.01%

-0.32%

Volatility

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) is 4.56%, while Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that FZAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAMXFZILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

5.37%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.46%

14.45%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

16.38%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

15.85%

+4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

17.40%

+3.51%

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAMX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FZILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Dividend Comparison

FZAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than FZILX's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z
5.79%10.09%6.93%2.83%5.86%18.58%1.41%3.50%10.72%7.81%5.00%4.90%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.35%2.67%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.37%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZAMX and FZILX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZILX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to FZAMX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAMX dropped -42.32% vs FZILX's -34.37%.

FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAMX and FZILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer