PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAMX vs. FZILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAMX achieves a 19.86% return, which is significantly higher than FZILX's 15.48% return.


FZAMX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.37%
YTD
19.86%
6M
22.36%
1Y
38.12%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
12.22%

FZILX

1D
0.53%
1M
5.00%
YTD
15.48%
6M
18.76%
1Y
33.05%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FZAMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z
19.86%12.00%17.39%15.15%-14.70%25.40%18.84%23.85%-18.51%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
15.48%33.52%5.32%16.28%-15.96%8.19%11.06%21.69%-9.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAMX and FZILX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2018

0.77

The correlation between FZAMX and FZILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAMX vs. FZILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAMX
FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FZILX
FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZAMXFZILXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.36

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.06

3.20

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

3.04

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.50

11.94

+3.56

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FZILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAMX and FZILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZAMXFZILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.36

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.59

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Drawdowns

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAMX drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, which is greater than FZILX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAMX and FZILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAMXFZILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.32%

-34.37%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-11.24%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.24%

-13.47%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-29.87%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

0.00%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-6.70%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.86%

-0.43%

Volatility

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) have volatilities of 4.83% and 4.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAMXFZILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.97%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

12.25%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.13%

14.64%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.22%

15.52%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

17.32%

+3.62%

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAMX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FZILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAMX vs. FZILX - Dividend Comparison

FZAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than FZILX's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z
5.88%10.09%6.93%2.83%5.86%18.58%1.41%3.50%10.72%7.81%5.00%4.90%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.32%2.67%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.37%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZAMX and FZILX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZILX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to FZAMX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAMX dropped -42.32% vs FZILX's -34.37%.

FZILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAMX and FZILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer