PPLT vs. SVR-C.TO
PPLT (abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF) and SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - PPLT is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Platinum Price PM, while SVR-C.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPLT returned 3.32%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for SVR-C.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPLT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR-C.TO.
Performance
PPLT vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PPLT is traded in USD, while SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR-C.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than SVR-C.TO's -17.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PPLT has underperformed SVR-C.TO with an annualized return of 3.32%, while SVR-C.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.
PPLT
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -19.03%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 6M
- -28.86%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -21.81%
- YTD
- -17.45%
- 6M
- -22.77%
- 1Y
- 63.83%
- 3Y*
- 36.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
PPLT vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -24.21% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | -17.45% | 144.05% | 20.41% | -0.28% | 3.15% | -12.98% | 47.38% | 13.97% | -9.93% | 4.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and SVR-C.TO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, PPLT and SVR-C.TO have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPLT vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PPLT
SVR-C.TO
PPLT vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPLT | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.26 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | 2.76 | -1.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than SVR-C.TO's maximum drawdown of -67.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and SVR-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPLT | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -67.24% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.98% | -51.08% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.98% | -51.08% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.98% | -51.08% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.14% | -51.08% | -0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.98% | -49.32% | +5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -40.00% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.30% | 23.18% | -3.88% |
Volatility
PPLT vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) is 12.58%, while iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) has a volatility of 15.47%. This indicates that PPLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVR-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPLT | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 15.47% | -2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.67% | 56.85% | -13.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.52% | 59.24% | -8.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.78% | 36.71% | -3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.21% | 32.53% | -3.32% |
PPLT vs. SVR-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SVR-C.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPLT vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPLT nor SVR-C.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPLT and SVR-C.TO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPLT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPLT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
PPLT is categorized as Precious Metals, while SVR-C.TO is Silver. PPLT tracks LBMA Platinum Price PM, while SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PPLT and 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
Find the right allocation for PPLT and SVR-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer