PPLT vs. SIVR
PPLT (Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPLT is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPLT returned 5.97%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for SIVR. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPLT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
PPLT vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -9.46% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PPLT has underperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 5.97%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.
PPLT
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- 71.46%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.97%
SIVR
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 24.90%
- 1Y
- 110.95%
- 3Y*
- 45.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
PPLT vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -9.46% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 2.85% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and SIVR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2010 | 0.65 |
The correlation between PPLT and SIVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPLT vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
PPLT
SIVR
PPLT vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPLT | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.63 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 5.67 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPLT | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.90 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.58 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.50 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.32 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPLT | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -75.85% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.41% | -42.42% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.41% | -42.42% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | -42.42% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.14% | -42.42% | -8.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.08% | -37.25% | +4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.95% | -47.85% | +7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.24% | 19.64% | -3.40% |
Volatility
PPLT vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) is 11.22%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that PPLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPLT | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.22% | 16.28% | -5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.68% | 58.30% | -13.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.72% | 58.84% | -8.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.49% | 36.17% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.00% | 31.87% | -2.87% |
PPLT vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPLT vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPLT nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPLT and SIVR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to PPLT (11.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLT dropped -70.73% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
On 10-year performance, SIVR leads with 15.77% vs 5.97% for PPLT. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PPLT has been the lower-risk option at 11.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PPLT.
PPLT and SIVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PPLT is categorized as Precious Metals, while SIVR is Silver. PPLT tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt), while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PPLT and 0.30% for SIVR.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPLT and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer