PPL.TO vs. RSPS
PPL.TO (Pembina Pipeline Corporation) is a stock, while RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) is Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. Over the past 10 years, PPL.TO returned 11.55%/yr vs 5.57%/yr for RSPS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PPL.TO vs. RSPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PPL.TO is traded in CAD, while RSPS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RSPS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPL.TO achieves a 30.78% return, which is significantly higher than RSPS's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PPL.TO has outperformed RSPS with an annualized return of 11.55%, while RSPS has yielded a comparatively lower 5.57% annualized return.
PPL.TO
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 30.78%
- 6M
- 28.18%
- 1Y
- 36.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 17.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
RSPS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 9.47%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 1.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
PPL.TO vs. RSPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPL.TO Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 30.78% | 3.76% | 22.71% | 5.56% | 26.63% | 36.13% | -32.39% | 24.75% | -6.28% | 13.75% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 9.47% | -5.40% | 6.88% | -7.64% | 9.40% | 14.63% | 3.68% | 22.88% | -3.37% | 6.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPL.TO and RSPS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.19 |
The correlation between PPL.TO and RSPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPL.TO vs. RSPS — Risk / Return Rank
PPL.TO
RSPS
PPL.TO vs. RSPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPL.TO | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.09 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 0.63 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.93 | 1.18 | +5.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPL.TO vs. RSPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPL.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than RSPS's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPL.TO and RSPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPL.TO | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.76% | -24.95% | -43.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.82% | -11.47% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.36% | -14.29% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.19% | -18.40% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.76% | -18.83% | -49.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -4.42% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -5.11% | -5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 6.10% | -0.67% |
Volatility
PPL.TO vs. RSPS - Volatility Comparison
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) at 4.55%. This indicates that PPL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPL.TO | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 4.55% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 11.11% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.99% | 14.61% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 15.04% | +3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.89% | 16.17% | +14.72% |
Dividends
PPL.TO vs. RSPS - Dividend Comparison
PPL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than RSPS's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPL.TO Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 4.20% | 5.39% | 5.15% | 5.82% | 5.55% | 6.57% | 8.37% | 4.90% | 5.53% | 4.48% | 4.52% | 5.97% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPL.TO and RSPS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PPL.TO and RSPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer