PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PPL.TO vs. CVE.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PPL.TOCVE.TO
YTD Return34.05%3.34%
1Y Return40.69%-6.30%
3Y Return (Ann)18.50%14.95%
5Y Return (Ann)10.71%14.84%
10Y Return (Ann)9.20%-0.13%
Sharpe Ratio3.60-0.28
Sortino Ratio4.81-0.21
Omega Ratio1.660.97
Calmar Ratio3.79-0.24
Martin Ratio29.85-0.62
Ulcer Index1.36%12.76%
Daily Std Dev11.23%27.99%
Max Drawdown-68.76%-92.84%
Current Drawdown-1.77%-24.45%

Fundamentals


PPL.TOCVE.TO
Market CapCA$33.49BCA$40.73B
EPSCA$3.29CA$1.96
PE Ratio17.5411.20
PEG Ratio1.360.28
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$7.73BCA$55.67B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$2.92BCA$8.37B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$2.42BCA$7.99B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between PPL.TO and CVE.TO is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PPL.TO vs. CVE.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PPL.TO achieves a 34.05% return, which is significantly higher than CVE.TO's 3.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PPL.TO has outperformed CVE.TO with an annualized return of 9.20%, while CVE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -0.13% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.60%
-19.65%
PPL.TO
CVE.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PPL.TO vs. CVE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPL.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PPL.TO, currently valued at 2.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PPL.TO, currently valued at 3.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PPL.TO, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.50
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PPL.TO, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PPL.TO, currently valued at 21.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0021.57
CVE.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CVE.TO, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CVE.TO, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CVE.TO, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CVE.TO, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.20
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CVE.TO, currently valued at -0.83, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.83

PPL.TO vs. CVE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is higher than the CVE.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPL.TO and CVE.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.79
-0.35
PPL.TO
CVE.TO

Dividends

PPL.TO vs. CVE.TO - Dividend Comparison

PPL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than CVE.TO's 3.51% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PPL.TO
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
4.63%5.83%5.57%6.57%8.37%4.90%5.53%4.48%4.52%5.97%4.06%4.40%
CVE.TO
Cenovus Energy Inc.
3.51%2.40%1.83%0.64%0.77%1.59%2.08%1.74%0.99%4.87%4.44%3.18%

Drawdowns

PPL.TO vs. CVE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPL.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, smaller than the maximum CVE.TO drawdown of -92.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPL.TO and CVE.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.61%
-46.87%
PPL.TO
CVE.TO

Volatility

PPL.TO vs. CVE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) is 5.24%, while Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that PPL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.24%
6.99%
PPL.TO
CVE.TO

Financials

PPL.TO vs. CVE.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pembina Pipeline Corporation and Cenovus Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items