PPI vs. TARK
PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) and TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by AXS, while TARK is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPI returned 18.90%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for TARK. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PPI charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TARK.
Performance
PPI vs. TARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPI achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly higher than TARK's -12.64% return.
PPI
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.41%
TARK
- 1D
- 8.86%
- 1M
- -12.32%
- 6M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -12.64%
- 1Y
- -11.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -6.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $458.77K | $622.77K | $642.93K | |
| $734.86K | $665.19K | $732.43K |
PPI vs. TARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF | 15.76% | 30.05% | 6.43% | 11.33% | -4.45% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -12.64% | 41.00% | -4.85% | 121.37% | -71.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPI and TARK is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2022 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PPI and TARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPI vs. TARK — Risk / Return Rank
PPI
TARK
PPI vs. TARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPI | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.03 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | -0.20 | +3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | -0.34 | +8.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPI vs. TARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPI drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum TARK drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPI and TARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPI | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -77.82% | +53.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -57.57% | +49.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | -65.55% | +44.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -42.52% | +38.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -50.54% | +44.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 33.69% | -30.50% |
Volatility
PPI vs. TARK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) is 4.24%, while Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a volatility of 22.77%. This indicates that PPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPI | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 22.77% | -18.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | 55.67% | -43.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 72.49% | -55.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 90.23% | -71.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 90.23% | -71.29% |
PPI vs. TARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TARK's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPI vs. TARK - Dividend Comparison
PPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than TARK's 34.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF | 1.30% | 1.06% | 0.60% | 2.87% | 2.40% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 34.34% | 30.00% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPI and TARK have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TARK has higher volatility (22.77%) compared to PPI (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPI dropped -24.54% vs TARK's -77.82%.
On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 18.90% vs 12.65% for TARK. On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 18.90% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.
TARK has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 1.30% for PPI.
PPI is categorized as Global Allocation, while TARK is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPI and 1.15% for TARK.
PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPI and TARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer