PPH vs. BIZD
PPH (VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPH returned 7.88%/yr vs 7.57%/yr for BIZD. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPH charges 0.36%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for BIZD.
Performance
PPH vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -6.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PPH having a 7.88% annualized return and BIZD not far behind at 7.57%.
PPH
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 23.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
BIZD
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- 6M
- -6.52%
- YTD
- -6.19%
- 1Y
- -14.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
PPH vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 4.95% | 22.00% | 8.05% | 6.95% | 2.64% | 17.79% | 5.49% | 19.39% | -5.89% | 15.23% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -6.19% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPH and BIZD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PPH and BIZD has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PPH vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPH
BIZD
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PPH
BIZD
-
Industrials
PPH
BIZD
-
Basic Materials
PPH
-
BIZD
-
Communication Services
PPH
-
BIZD
-
Consumer Cyclical
PPH
-
BIZD
-
Consumer Defensive
PPH
-
BIZD
-
Energy
PPH
-
BIZD
-
Financial Services
PPH
-
BIZD
Real Estate
PPH
-
BIZD
-
Technology
PPH
-
BIZD
-
Utilities
PPH
-
BIZD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPH vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank
PPH
BIZD
PPH vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPH | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.88 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | -0.67 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | -1.06 | +6.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPH vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and BIZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPH | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.45% | -55.44% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -22.22% | +11.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -22.56% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.26% | -22.91% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | -55.44% | +25.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -16.79% | +12.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -6.81% | -10.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 13.95% | -9.52% |
Volatility
PPH vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 4.95%. This indicates that PPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPH | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 4.95% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 14.96% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 18.65% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 17.48% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 21.78% | -4.77% |
PPH vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPH vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than BIZD's 12.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 12.13% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.03% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPH and BIZD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPH has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to BIZD (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPH dropped -51.45% vs BIZD's -55.44%.
On 10-year performance, PPH leads with 7.88% vs 7.57% for BIZD. On fees, PPH is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PPH has performed better with a 7.88% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPH is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 12.13%, compared with 2.03% for PPH.
PPH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PPH and 12.86% for BIZD.
PPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPH and BIZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer