PPA vs. XME
PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index, while XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPA returned 17.72%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for XME. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.
Performance
PPA vs. XME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 16.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PPA has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 17.72%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.
PPA
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 28.73%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- 17.72%
XME
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 86.41%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
PPA vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 11.20% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 9.52% | 7.09% | 0.45% | 39.63% | -7.51% | 30.10% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 16.32% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPA and XME is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.60 |
The correlation between PPA and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
PPA vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPA
XME
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
PPA
XME
Technology
PPA
XME
Communication Services
PPA
XME
-
Financial Services
PPA
XME
-
Basic Materials
PPA
-
XME
Consumer Cyclical
PPA
-
XME
-
Consumer Defensive
PPA
-
XME
Energy
PPA
-
XME
Healthcare
PPA
-
XME
-
Real Estate
PPA
-
XME
-
Utilities
PPA
-
XME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPA vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank
PPA
XME
PPA vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPA | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 3.84 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 9.58 | -3.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPA vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and XME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPA | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.37% | -85.89% | +28.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -22.60% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | -30.47% | +15.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | -37.27% | +18.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.92% | -61.69% | +17.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -9.33% | +3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -44.09% | +34.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 9.05% | -4.20% |
Volatility
PPA vs. XME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) is 8.91%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that PPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPA | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.91% | 15.26% | -6.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.06% | 28.51% | -11.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 36.11% | -16.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 32.84% | -14.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 32.96% | -12.23% |
PPA vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPA vs. XME - Dividend Comparison
PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.38% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPA and XME have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to PPA (8.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPA dropped -57.37% vs XME's -85.89%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 17.72% for PPA. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PPA has been the lower-risk option at 8.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 17.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.
PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.32% for XME.
PPA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while XME is Materials. PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.35% for XME.
XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPA and XME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer