PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPA vs. VIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPA vs. VIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 14.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PPA has outperformed VIS with an annualized return of 17.38%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively lower 14.06% annualized return.


PPA

1D
-1.74%
1M
3.19%
YTD
8.54%
6M
13.46%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
17.38%

VIS

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.27%
YTD
14.63%
6M
15.23%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPA vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.54%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
14.63%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PPA and VIS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2005

0.88

The correlation between PPA and VIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PPA vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PPA
VIS

Industrials

90.1%
89.4%

Technology

9.8%
4.5%

Communication Services

0.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

4.3%

Industrials

PPA
90.1%
VIS
89.4%

Technology

PPA
9.8%
VIS
4.5%

Communication Services

PPA
0.1%
VIS
0.0%

Basic Materials

PPA

-

VIS
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PPA

-

VIS
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

PPA

-

VIS

-

Energy

PPA

-

VIS
0.1%

Financial Services

PPA

-

VIS
0.2%

Healthcare

PPA

-

VIS
0.0%

Real Estate

PPA

-

VIS
0.0%

Utilities

PPA

-

VIS
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPA vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPA vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPAVISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.18

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.68

9.06

-3.38

PPA vs. VIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the VIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPA and VIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPAVISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.64

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.69

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.69

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.52

+0.14

Drawdowns

PPA vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and VIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPAVISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.37%

-63.51%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-12.29%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.24%

-20.80%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-22.96%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.92%

-42.42%

-1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.40%

-1.22%

-7.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.18%

-8.38%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

2.96%

+1.73%

Volatility

PPA vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) at 5.15%. This indicates that PPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPAVISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

5.15%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.95%

13.47%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

16.42%

+2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

18.35%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

20.43%

+0.21%

PPA vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPA vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison

PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than VIS's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.39%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.89%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPA and VIS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPA has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to VIS (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPA dropped -57.37% vs VIS's -63.51%.

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.38% vs 14.06% for VIS. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VIS has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 14.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

VIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.39% for PPA.

PPA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while VIS is Industrials Equities. PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.10% for VIS.

VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPA and VIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer