PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPA vs. SMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPA vs. SMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -30.20% return.


PPA

1D
-1.24%
1M
2.73%
YTD
11.20%
6M
13.03%
1Y
28.73%
3Y*
28.86%
5Y*
18.41%
10Y*
17.72%

SMR

1D
3.34%
1M
-17.31%
YTD
-30.20%
6M
-46.07%
1Y
-75.51%
3Y*
5.43%
5Y*
-0.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPA vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
11.20%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.22%
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
-30.20%-20.97%444.98%-67.93%2.29%-0.89%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PPA and SMR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPA vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SMR
SMR Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPA vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPASMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.87

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

-0.91

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

-1.32

+7.26

PPA vs. SMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the SMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPA and SMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPA vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, smaller than the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and SMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPASMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.37%

-87.47%

+30.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-82.86%

+69.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.24%

-82.86%

+67.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-87.47%

+69.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.15%

-81.49%

+75.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.18%

-35.08%

+25.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

57.39%

-52.54%

Volatility

PPA vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) is 8.91%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 28.93%. This indicates that PPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPASMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.91%

28.93%

-20.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.06%

69.57%

-52.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.04%

102.59%

-82.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.70%

93.50%

-74.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

89.31%

-68.58%

Dividends

PPA vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison

PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.38%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPA and SMR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMR has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to PPA (8.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPA dropped -57.37% vs SMR's -87.47%.

PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPA and SMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer