POWR vs. ECLN

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. POWR is passively managed, while ECLN is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ECLN.

Performance

POWR vs. ECLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

POWR

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -0.82%
• 6M: 14.25%
• YTD: 14.64%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: 10.27%
• 5Y*: 15.77%
• 10Y*: 7.81%

ECLN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWR vs. ECLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF	14.64%	10.81%	-1.30%	3.66%	42.54%	42.03%	-28.30%	9.86%
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	12.96%	16.78%	22.60%	-3.36%	5.28%	12.26%	8.98%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between POWR and ECLN is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2019	0.41

POWR vs. ECLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	POWR	ECLN
Utilities	56.4%	76.4%
Industrials	25.2%	6.8%
Energy	17.8%	16.3%
Technology	0.5%	0.5%
Basic Materials	0.2%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

POWR vs. ECLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWR

POWR Risk / Return Rank: 37
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 28
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 45

ECLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWR vs. ECLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POWR	ECLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.94	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	POWR	ECLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.68%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.04%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	POWR	ECLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.87%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.03%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.49%	—	—

POWR vs. ECLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLN's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWR vs. ECLN - Dividend Comparison

POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, while ECLN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	1.43%	1.97%	2.52%	2.54%	1.72%	1.66%	1.68%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF	5.62%	7.56%	4.36%	4.16%	4.82%	3.94%	3.96%	5.71%	3.17%	3.11%	2.75%	3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POWR and ECLN in my portfolio?

POWR and ECLN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, POWR or ECLN?

On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, POWR or ECLN?

POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POWR or ECLN?

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 1.43% for ECLN.

What is the main difference between POWR and ECLN?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.97% for ECLN.