POWR vs. BILT
POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds from iShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BILT.
Performance
POWR vs. BILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 17.85% return, which is significantly higher than BILT's 13.97% return.
POWR
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 17.85%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 23.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
BILT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWR vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 17.85% | 1.67% |
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 13.97% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWR and BILT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWR vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank
POWR
BILT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
POWR vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWR vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and BILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -5.38% | -60.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -0.99% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.09% | -1.44% | -16.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | — | — |
Volatility
POWR vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.83% | 10.26% | +6.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.07% | 10.26% | +12.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.52% | 10.26% | +15.26% |
POWR vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWR vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison
POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, less than BILT's 5.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.72% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 5.47% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWR and BILT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 5.47% for POWR.
Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.60% for BILT.
Find the right allocation for POWR and BILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer