POWR vs. BILT
POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds from iShares. POWR is passively managed, while BILT is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BILT.
Performance
POWR vs. BILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly lower than BILT's 16.00% return.
POWR
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
BILT
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 14.34%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWR vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 13.53% | 1.67% |
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 16.00% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWR and BILT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWR vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank
POWR
BILT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
POWR vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWR vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and BILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -5.38% | -60.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -0.07% | -5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -1.38% | -16.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility
POWR vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | 10.31% | +6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 10.31% | +12.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 10.31% | +15.18% |
POWR vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWR vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison
POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than BILT's 5.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.62% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 5.68% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWR and BILT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 5.62% for BILT.
Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.60% for BILT.
Find the right allocation for POWR and BILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer