POWR vs. BILT
POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds from iShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BILT.
Performance
POWR vs. BILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 18.53% return, which is significantly higher than BILT's 12.39% return.
POWR
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 18.53%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
BILT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWR vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 18.53% | 2.51% |
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 12.39% | 3.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWR and BILT is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWR vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank
POWR
BILT
POWR vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 2.00 | -1.81 |
Drawdowns
POWR vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and BILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -5.38% | -60.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -2.36% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -1.44% | -16.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | — | — |
Volatility
POWR vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWR | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 10.28% | +6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 10.28% | +12.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 10.28% | +15.34% |
POWR vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWR vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison
POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than BILT's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 1.33% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 6.67% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWR and BILT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 1.33% for BILT.
Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.60% for BILT.
Find the right allocation for POWR and BILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer