POWL vs. FNGU
POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.) is a stock, while FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Over the past year, POWL returned 372.00% vs 25.83% for FNGU. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
POWL vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWL achieves a 177.61% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 3.96% return.
POWL
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 177.61%
- 6M
- 162.55%
- 1Y
- 372.00%
- 3Y*
- 146.47%
- 5Y*
- 94.19%
- 10Y*
- 40.56%
FNGU
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -13.99%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- -3.67%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWL vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 177.61% | 64.58% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 3.96% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWL and FNGU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.46 |
The correlation between POWL and FNGU shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWL vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank
POWL
FNGU
POWL vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWL | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.11 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.71 | 0.36 | +11.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.97 | 0.85 | +36.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWL vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWL drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWL and FNGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWL | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.10% | -61.30% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.88% | -59.55% | +28.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -27.36% | +18.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.09% | -22.25% | -13.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 24.91% | -15.15% |
Volatility
POWL vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) is 19.86%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 27.31%. This indicates that POWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWL | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.86% | 27.31% | -7.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.83% | 50.15% | -5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.91% | 61.43% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.36% | 79.93% | -15.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.84% | 79.93% | -25.09% |
Dividends
POWL vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 1.19% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.12% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 4.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWL and FNGU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGU has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to POWL (19.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWL dropped -73.10% vs FNGU's -61.30%.
POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.03 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWL and FNGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer