POWI vs. GFS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

POWI (Power Integrations, Inc.) and GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, POWI returned -4.35%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for GFS. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

POWI vs. GFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWI achieves a 122.07% return, which is significantly lower than GFS's 133.05% return.

POWI

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 7.28%
• YTD: 122.07%
• 6M: 116.41%
• 1Y: 44.71%
• 3Y*: -4.35%
• 5Y*: 0.58%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

GFS

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 14.57%
• YTD: 133.05%
• 6M: 110.12%
• 1Y: 121.62%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWI vs. GFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
POWI Power Integrations, Inc.	122.07%	-41.33%	-23.97%	15.56%	-22.09%	-6.19%
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.	133.05%	-18.62%	-29.19%	12.45%	-17.05%	38.23%

Correlation

The correlation between POWI and GFS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.64

The correlation between POWI and GFS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap POWI : $4.38B GFS : $45.65B
EPS POWI : $0.30 GFS : $1.39
PE Ratio POWI : 264.07 GFS : 58.52
PS Ratio POWI : 9.82 GFS : 6.66
PB Ratio POWI : 6.52 GFS : 3.90
Total Revenue (TTM) POWI : $446.28M GFS : $6.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) POWI : $240.35M GFS : $1.81B
EBITDA (TTM) POWI : $30.43M GFS : $2.16B

Return for Risk

POWI vs. GFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWI

POWI Risk / Return Rank: 63
POWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
POWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
POWI Omega Ratio Rank: 64
POWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
POWI Martin Ratio Rank: 59

GFS

GFS Risk / Return Rank: 89
GFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GFS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GFS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWI vs. GFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POWI	GFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	2.14	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	2.87	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.35	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	4.79	-3.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.59	9.21	-7.62

POWI vs. GFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWI Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the GFS Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWI and GFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POWI vs. GFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWI drawdown since its inception was -85.76%, which is greater than GFS's maximum drawdown of -61.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWI and GFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	POWI	GFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.76%	-61.53%	-24.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.83%	-24.10%	-23.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.82%	-55.40%	-12.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.68%	-9.54%	-15.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.64%	-34.49%	-4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.20%	12.50%	+11.70%

Volatility

POWI vs. GFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) is 23.59%, while GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a volatility of 26.45%. This indicates that POWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POWI	GFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.59%	26.45%	-2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.72%	45.29%	-6.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.89%	54.03%	+2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.48%	51.19%	-6.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.64%	51.19%	-9.55%

Dividends

POWI vs. GFS - Dividend Comparison

POWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while GFS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POWI Power Integrations, Inc.	1.08%	2.36%	1.31%	0.94%	1.00%	0.58%	0.51%	0.71%	1.05%	0.76%	0.77%	0.99%

Financials

POWI vs. GFS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Power Integrations, Inc. and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

POWI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Integrations, Inc. reported a gross profit of 56.94M and revenue of 108.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

GFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

POWI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Integrations, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.45M and revenue of 108.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

GFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

POWI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Integrations, Inc. reported a net income of 3.30M and revenue of 108.31M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

GFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POWI and GFS in my portfolio?

POWI and GFS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POWI or GFS?

GFS has higher volatility (26.45%) compared to POWI (23.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWI dropped -85.76% vs GFS's -61.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.