POWA vs. FMAY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - POWA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while FMAY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, POWA returned 7.06%/yr vs 9.00%/yr for FMAY. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FMAY.

Performance

POWA vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than FMAY's 5.43% return.

POWA

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: -1.12%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: 10.31%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 10.13%
• ALL TIME*: 8.65%

FMAY

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 0.39%
• 6M: 4.78%
• YTD: 5.43%
• 1Y: 12.00%
• 3Y*: 12.48%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	$1.41M	$1.35M	$5.09M
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	$229.23K	$296.08K	$400.22K

POWA vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	0.99%	11.71%	13.18%	10.58%	-7.67%	24.93%	23.27%
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	5.43%	12.69%	14.45%	17.83%	-8.08%	11.00%	10.80%

Correlation

The correlation between POWA and FMAY is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020	0.76

The correlation between POWA and FMAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

POWA vs. FMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	POWA	FMAY
Technology	23.0%	37.9%
Industrials	19.6%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	17.9%	4.6%
Healthcare	17.4%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	16.1%	9.6%
Communication Services	2.1%	10.0%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.9%
Financial Services	1.9%	11.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Energy	-	3.0%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

POWA vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

POWA

POWA Risk / Return Rank: 18
POWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
POWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
POWA Omega Ratio Rank: 18
POWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
POWA Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FMAY

FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 77
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

POWA vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POWA	FMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.63	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	2.33	-1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.33	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	2.65	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.03	13.18	-12.15

POWA vs. FMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the FMAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWA and FMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POWA vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than FMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and FMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	POWA	FMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.91%	-13.60%	-34.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-4.22%	-5.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	-13.12%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.75%	-13.60%	-4.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.30%	-0.48%	-2.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-1.98%	-4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.24%	0.85%	+3.39%

Volatility

POWA vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 2.40%. This indicates that POWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POWA	FMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	2.40%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	5.85%	+3.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.11%	6.86%	+5.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.99%	10.68%	+3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.07%	10.14%	+5.93%

POWA vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWA vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison

POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	0.93%	0.94%	0.79%	1.60%	1.48%	1.06%	1.34%	1.16%	1.39%	1.63%	2.18%	3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POWA and FMAY in my portfolio?

POWA and FMAY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POWA or FMAY?

POWA has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to FMAY (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs FMAY's -13.60%.

Which ETF is better, POWA or FMAY?

On 5-year performance, FMAY leads with 9.00% vs 7.06% for POWA. On fees, POWA is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, POWA or FMAY?

Over the 5-year period, FMAY has performed better with a 9.00% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, POWA or FMAY?

POWA is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POWA or FMAY?

POWA has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.

What is the main difference between POWA and FMAY?

POWA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FMAY is Defined Outcome. POWA tracks Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.85% for FMAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.