POWA vs. BIL
POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POWA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, POWA returned 10.28%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
POWA vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, POWA has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 10.28%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.
POWA
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -3.75%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
POWA vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | -2.46% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 24.93% | 7.61% | 27.98% | -3.96% | 21.52% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.69% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWA and BIL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWA vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
POWA
BIL
POWA vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWA | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -172.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 87.41 | -86.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 353.28 | -353.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | 2,801.36 | -2,800.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWA vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWA | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -0.78% | -47.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -0.01% | -9.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -0.01% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -0.09% | -17.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | -0.21% | -36.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.60% | 0.00% | -6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -0.26% | -5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 0.00% | +3.91% |
Volatility
POWA vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that POWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWA | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 0.07% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 0.14% | +8.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 0.20% | +11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 0.26% | +13.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 0.26% | +15.79% |
POWA vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWA vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.85% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | 0.96% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWA and BIL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWA has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs BIL's -0.78%.
On 10-year performance, POWA leads with 10.28% vs 2.20% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, POWA has performed better with a 10.28% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWA.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.96% for POWA.
POWA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. POWA tracks Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.14% for BIL.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.43 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWA and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer