SAPH vs. SCUB
SAPH (ADRhedged SAP ETF) and SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SAPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SCUB.
Performance
SAPH vs. SCUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SAPH
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- 15.89%
- 6M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- -21.87%
- 1Y
- -35.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.33%
SCUB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.78K | $28.87K | $22.76K | |
| $5.73K | $11.42K | $8.68K |
SAPH vs. SCUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF | 12.01% |
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAPH and SCUB is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAPH vs. SCUB — Risk / Return Rank
SAPH
SCUB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SAPH vs. SCUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAPH | SCUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAPH vs. SCUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAPH drawdown since its inception was -51.72%, which is greater than SCUB's maximum drawdown of -0.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAPH and SCUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAPH | SCUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.72% | -0.18% | -51.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.42% | 0.00% | -41.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.15% | -0.02% | -23.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.13% | — | — |
Volatility
SAPH vs. SCUB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAPH | SCUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.42% | 0.86% | +36.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 0.86% | +34.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 0.86% | +34.67% |
SAPH vs. SCUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SCUB's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAPH vs. SCUB - Dividend Comparison
SAPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than SCUB's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF | 3.57% |
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAPH and SCUB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SCUB.
SAPH has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 1.33% for SCUB.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SAPH and 0.30% for SCUB.
Find the right allocation for SAPH and SCUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer