POW vs. QUSA
POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and QUSA (VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares, while QUSA is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QUSA.
Performance
POW vs. QUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 38.73% return, which is significantly higher than QUSA's 10.88% return.
POW
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- 6M
- 18.68%
- YTD
- 38.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QUSA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 6.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.11M | $2.15M | $2.58M | |
| $298.36K | $303.07K | $276.86K |
POW vs. QUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.73% | -1.70% |
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF | 10.88% | -3.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between POW and QUSA is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POW vs. QUSA — Risk / Return Rank
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QUSA
POW vs. QUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POW | QUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POW vs. QUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, which is greater than QUSA's maximum drawdown of -10.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and QUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POW | QUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -10.64% | -17.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.49% | -0.68% | -17.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -3.57% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.76% | — |
Volatility
POW vs. QUSA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POW | QUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.40% | 11.02% | +23.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 10.87% | +23.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 10.87% | +23.53% |
POW vs. QUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QUSA's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
POW vs. QUSA - Dividend Comparison
POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than QUSA's 15.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% |
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF | 15.15% | 6.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POW and QUSA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QUSA.
QUSA has the higher dividend yield at 15.15%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
POW is categorized as Actively Managed, while QUSA is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.95% for QUSA.
Find the right allocation for POW and QUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer