POW vs. EINC
POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. POW is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
POW vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 22.51% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 27.51% return.
POW
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -20.54%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 22.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 27.51%
- 1Y
- 30.30%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 22.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.48M | $2.79M | $2.23M | |
| $2.43M | $2.30M | $3.15M |
POW vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 22.51% | -1.70% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 27.51% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between POW and EINC is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POW vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EINC
POW vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POW | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POW vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POW | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -87.55% | +59.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.02% | -3.33% | -24.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -43.87% | +38.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility
POW vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POW | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.78% | 15.46% | +18.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 19.50% | +14.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 25.34% | +8.44% |
POW vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
POW vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than EINC's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.47% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POW and EINC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.16% for POW.
POW is categorized as Actively Managed, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.45% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for POW and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer