POW vs. AFOS
POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares, while AFOS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by ARS Investment Partners. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
POW vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 38.73% return, which is significantly higher than AFOS's 31.85% return.
POW
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- 6M
- 18.68%
- YTD
- 38.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 21.43%
- YTD
- 31.85%
- 1Y
- 68.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 70.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $534.27K | $476.43K | $469.20K | |
| $1.11M | $2.15M | $2.58M |
POW vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.73% | -1.70% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 31.85% | 6.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between POW and AFOS is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POW vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AFOS
POW vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POW | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 21.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POW vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POW | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -11.80% | -16.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.49% | -3.61% | -14.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -1.82% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility
POW vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POW | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.40% | 23.23% | +11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 22.40% | +12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 22.40% | +12.00% |
POW vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
POW vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POW and AFOS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
POW is categorized as Actively Managed, while AFOS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for POW and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer