POEAX vs. POBAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

POEAX (Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth) and POBAX (Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Pacific Funds Series Trust. Over the past 10 years, POEAX returned 10.89%/yr vs 5.86%/yr for POBAX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

POEAX vs. POBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POEAX achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly higher than POBAX's 5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, POEAX has outperformed POBAX with an annualized return of 10.89%, while POBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.86% annualized return.

POEAX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 3.86%
• YTD: 11.26%
• 6M: 11.59%
• 1Y: 26.18%
• 3Y*: 17.78%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 10.89%

POBAX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 5.37%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 14.31%
• 3Y*: 10.56%
• 5Y*: 3.75%
• 10Y*: 5.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POEAX vs. POBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
POEAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth	11.26%	16.66%	15.13%	18.53%	-21.24%	18.82%	16.09%	26.91%	-9.28%	19.17%
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative	5.37%	11.53%	8.17%	11.33%	-16.92%	7.64%	12.39%	15.64%	-5.83%	10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between POEAX and POBAX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2004	0.94

The correlation between POEAX and POBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

POEAX vs. POBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POEAX

POEAX Risk / Return Rank: 62
POEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
POEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
POEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
POEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
POEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

POBAX

POBAX Risk / Return Rank: 62
POBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
POBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
POBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
POBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
POBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POEAX vs. POBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POEAX	POBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.32	-0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.38	-0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.44	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	2.84	+0.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.00	12.88	+1.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POEAX vs. POBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POEAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the POBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POEAX and POBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POEAX	POBAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.32	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.33	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.59	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.59	-0.20

Drawdowns

POEAX vs. POBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POEAX drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, which is greater than POBAX's maximum drawdown of -29.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POEAX and POBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	POEAX	POBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.49%	-29.15%	-28.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.57%	-5.15%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.49%	-8.39%	-9.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.40%	-22.33%	-7.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.88%	-22.33%	-13.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.81%	-3.59%	-5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	1.14%	+0.78%

Volatility

POEAX vs. POBAX - Volatility Comparison

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) at 2.04%. This indicates that POEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POEAX	POBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.22%	2.04%	+1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.13%	5.09%	+4.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.89%	6.27%	+5.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	11.40%	+13.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.56%	9.88%	+11.68%

POEAX vs. POBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both POEAX and POBAX have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

POEAX vs. POBAX - Dividend Comparison

POEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than POBAX's 2.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative	2.90%	3.06%	3.68%	2.67%	13.64%	6.84%	2.56%	2.31%	20.06%	3.22%	4.32%	5.46%
POEAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth	6.94%	7.73%	2.12%	1.67%	36.10%	10.62%	3.32%	7.91%	24.81%	4.03%	7.09%	3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POEAX and POBAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, POEAX and POBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, POEAX or POBAX?

POEAX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to POBAX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POEAX dropped -57.49% vs POBAX's -29.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

POBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.