POEAX vs. POAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative (POAAX).
POEAX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Dec 30, 2003. POAAX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Dec 30, 2003.
Performance
POEAX vs. POAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
POEAX vs. POAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POEAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth | -1.83% | 16.66% | 15.13% | 18.53% | -21.24% | 18.82% | 16.09% | 26.91% | -9.28% | 19.17% |
POAAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative | -0.68% | 9.54% | 6.07% | 9.40% | -15.03% | 3.96% | 10.82% | 12.14% | -4.18% | 7.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POEAX achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than POAAX's -0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, POEAX has outperformed POAAX with an annualized return of 9.75%, while POAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.87% annualized return.
POEAX
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 17.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
POAAX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 7.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
POEAX vs. POAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both POEAX and POAAX have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
POEAX vs. POAAX — Risk / Return Rank
POEAX
POAAX
POEAX vs. POAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative (POAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POEAX | POAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.37 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.96 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.90 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 7.84 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POEAX | POAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.37 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.29 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.60 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.72 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between POEAX and POAAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
POEAX vs. POAAX - Dividend Comparison
POEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%, more than POAAX's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POEAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth | 7.87% | 7.73% | 2.12% | 1.67% | 36.10% | 10.62% | 3.32% | 7.91% | 24.81% | 4.03% | 7.09% | 3.16% |
POAAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative | 3.86% | 3.84% | 4.24% | 3.39% | 6.99% | 4.14% | 2.89% | 2.04% | 12.02% | 2.18% | 1.28% | 3.64% |
Drawdowns
POEAX vs. POAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POEAX drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, which is greater than POAAX's maximum drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POEAX and POAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| POEAX | POAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.49% | -20.48% | -37.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.79% | -4.23% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.40% | -20.48% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.88% | -20.48% | -15.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.04% | -2.74% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -2.82% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 1.02% | +1.43% |
Volatility
POEAX vs. POAAX - Volatility Comparison
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative (POAAX) at 2.43%. This indicates that POEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| POEAX | POAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 2.43% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 3.46% | +5.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.91% | 5.79% | +11.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 7.35% | +17.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 6.43% | +15.11% |