POCT vs. PAUG
POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) and PAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - POCT tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index while PAUG tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, POCT returned 9.66%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for PAUG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
POCT vs. PAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with POCT having a 4.58% return and PAUG slightly lower at 4.57%.
POCT
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- —
PAUG
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- —
POCT vs. PAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 4.58% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | -1.26% | 9.46% | 10.40% | 2.68% |
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 4.57% | 12.34% | 15.37% | 17.71% | -6.85% | 7.58% | 9.82% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between POCT and PAUG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between POCT and PAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
POCT vs. PAUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
POCT
PAUG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
POCT
PAUG
Financial Services
POCT
PAUG
Communication Services
POCT
PAUG
Consumer Cyclical
POCT
PAUG
Healthcare
POCT
PAUG
Industrials
POCT
PAUG
Consumer Defensive
POCT
PAUG
Energy
POCT
PAUG
Utilities
POCT
PAUG
Real Estate
POCT
PAUG
Basic Materials
POCT
PAUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POCT vs. PAUG — Risk / Return Rank
POCT
PAUG
POCT vs. PAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POCT | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.57 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.78 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.48 | 20.65 | -4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POCT | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.68 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 1.05 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
POCT vs. PAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, which is greater than PAUG's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and PAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POCT | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -17.88% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.40% | -3.96% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.22% | -10.45% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.22% | -11.76% | +1.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.42% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -1.81% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.72% | +0.14% |
Volatility
POCT vs. PAUG - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) at 0.68%. This indicates that POCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POCT | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 0.68% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.87% | 4.21% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23% | 5.60% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 8.71% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 10.59% | -0.36% |
POCT vs. PAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both POCT and PAUG have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
POCT vs. PAUG - Dividend Comparison
Neither POCT nor PAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, POCT and PAUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
POCT has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to PAUG (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCT dropped -18.80% vs PAUG's -17.88%.
On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.66% vs 9.10% for PAUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
POCT and PAUG have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
POCT and PAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while PAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index.
PAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POCT and PAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer