PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POCT vs. PAUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POCT vs. PAUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with POCT having a 4.58% return and PAUG slightly lower at 4.57%.


POCT

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.42%
YTD
4.58%
6M
5.03%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*

PAUG

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.68%
YTD
4.57%
6M
5.04%
1Y
14.91%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POCT vs. PAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
4.58%11.00%9.54%20.12%-1.26%9.46%10.40%2.68%
PAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August
4.57%12.34%15.37%17.71%-6.85%7.58%9.82%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between POCT and PAUG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.86

The correlation between POCT and PAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

POCT vs. PAUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
POCT
PAUG

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

POCT
36.2%
PAUG
36.2%

Financial Services

POCT
11.9%
PAUG
11.9%

Communication Services

POCT
10.9%
PAUG
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

POCT
10.1%
PAUG
10.1%

Healthcare

POCT
8.4%
PAUG
8.4%

Industrials

POCT
8.1%
PAUG
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

POCT
4.9%
PAUG
4.9%

Energy

POCT
3.5%
PAUG
3.5%

Utilities

POCT
2.3%
PAUG
2.3%

Real Estate

POCT
1.9%
PAUG
1.9%

Basic Materials

POCT
1.8%
PAUG
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POCT vs. PAUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PAUG
PAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POCT vs. PAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POCTPAUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.57

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.78

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.48

20.65

-4.17

POCT vs. PAUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the PAUG Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POCT and PAUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POCTPAUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.68

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

1.05

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.88

-0.01

Drawdowns

POCT vs. PAUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, which is greater than PAUG's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and PAUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POCTPAUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-17.88%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.40%

-3.96%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.22%

-10.45%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

-11.76%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.42%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-1.81%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.72%

+0.14%

Volatility

POCT vs. PAUG - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) at 0.68%. This indicates that POCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POCTPAUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.68%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.87%

4.21%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23%

5.60%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.94%

8.71%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.23%

10.59%

-0.36%

POCT vs. PAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both POCT and PAUG have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

POCT vs. PAUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither POCT nor PAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, POCT and PAUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

POCT has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to PAUG (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCT dropped -18.80% vs PAUG's -17.88%.

On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.66% vs 9.10% for PAUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

POCT and PAUG have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

POCT and PAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while PAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index.

PAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POCT and PAUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer