PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POCAX vs. POBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POCAX vs. POBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate (POCAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POCAX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than POBAX's 5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, POCAX has outperformed POBAX with an annualized return of 7.87%, while POBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.86% annualized return.


POCAX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.99%
YTD
7.64%
6M
7.68%
1Y
18.76%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
7.87%

POBAX

1D
0.09%
1M
2.08%
YTD
5.37%
6M
5.65%
1Y
14.31%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
5.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POCAX vs. POBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POCAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate
7.64%12.91%11.62%13.95%-18.67%11.94%14.65%20.36%-7.41%13.51%
POBAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative
5.37%11.53%8.17%11.33%-16.92%7.64%12.39%15.64%-5.83%10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between POCAX and POBAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2004

0.97

The correlation between POCAX and POBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POCAX vs. POBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POCAX
POCAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
POCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
POCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

POBAX
POBAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
POBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
POBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
POBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
POBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POCAX vs. POBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate (POCAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POCAXPOBAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

2.32

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

3.38

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.84

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.48

12.88

+0.60

POCAX vs. POBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the POBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POCAX and POBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POCAXPOBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.32

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.33

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.59

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.59

-0.09

Drawdowns

POCAX vs. POBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POCAX drawdown since its inception was -40.19%, which is greater than POBAX's maximum drawdown of -29.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCAX and POBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POCAXPOBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.19%

-29.15%

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-5.15%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.03%

-8.39%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.92%

-22.33%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.59%

-22.33%

-4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-3.59%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.14%

+0.28%

Volatility

POCAX vs. POBAX - Volatility Comparison

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate (POCAX) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) at 2.04%. This indicates that POCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POCAXPOBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.04%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.62%

5.09%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.34%

6.27%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

11.40%

+5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.46%

9.88%

+4.58%

POCAX vs. POBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both POCAX and POBAX have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

POCAX vs. POBAX - Dividend Comparison

POCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than POBAX's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POBAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative
2.90%3.06%3.68%2.67%13.64%6.84%2.56%2.31%20.06%3.22%4.32%5.46%
POCAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate
6.85%7.37%2.97%1.68%22.92%8.62%3.11%5.02%22.38%3.85%5.44%6.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, POCAX and POBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

POCAX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to POBAX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCAX dropped -40.19% vs POBAX's -29.15%.

POBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POCAX and POBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer