POCAX vs. POBAX
POCAX (Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate) and POBAX (Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Pacific Funds Series Trust. Over the past 10 years, POCAX returned 7.87%/yr vs 5.86%/yr for POBAX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
POCAX vs. POBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POCAX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than POBAX's 5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, POCAX has outperformed POBAX with an annualized return of 7.87%, while POBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.86% annualized return.
POCAX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 7.64%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 18.76%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
POBAX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 5.37%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 14.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
POCAX vs. POBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POCAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate | 7.64% | 12.91% | 11.62% | 13.95% | -18.67% | 11.94% | 14.65% | 20.36% | -7.41% | 13.51% |
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative | 5.37% | 11.53% | 8.17% | 11.33% | -16.92% | 7.64% | 12.39% | 15.64% | -5.83% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between POCAX and POBAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2004 | 0.97 |
The correlation between POCAX and POBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POCAX vs. POBAX — Risk / Return Rank
POCAX
POBAX
POCAX vs. POBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate (POCAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POCAX | POBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | 2.32 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.27 | 3.38 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 2.84 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.48 | 12.88 | +0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POCAX | POBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.32 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.33 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.59 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
POCAX vs. POBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POCAX drawdown since its inception was -40.19%, which is greater than POBAX's maximum drawdown of -29.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCAX and POBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POCAX | POBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.19% | -29.15% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -5.15% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.03% | -8.39% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.92% | -22.33% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.59% | -22.33% | -4.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -3.59% | -1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.42% | 1.14% | +0.28% |
Volatility
POCAX vs. POBAX - Volatility Comparison
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate (POCAX) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) at 2.04%. This indicates that POCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POCAX | POBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | 2.04% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.62% | 5.09% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.34% | 6.27% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 11.40% | +5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 9.88% | +4.58% |
POCAX vs. POBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both POCAX and POBAX have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
POCAX vs. POBAX - Dividend Comparison
POCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than POBAX's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative | 2.90% | 3.06% | 3.68% | 2.67% | 13.64% | 6.84% | 2.56% | 2.31% | 20.06% | 3.22% | 4.32% | 5.46% |
POCAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate | 6.85% | 7.37% | 2.97% | 1.68% | 22.92% | 8.62% | 3.11% | 5.02% | 22.38% | 3.85% | 5.44% | 6.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, POCAX and POBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
POCAX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to POBAX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCAX dropped -40.19% vs POBAX's -29.15%.
POBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POCAX and POBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer