PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POBAX vs. NWQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POBAX vs. NWQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POBAX achieves a 5.37% return, which is significantly higher than NWQIX's 5.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with POBAX having a 5.86% annualized return and NWQIX not far behind at 5.67%.


POBAX

1D
0.09%
1M
2.08%
YTD
5.37%
6M
5.65%
1Y
14.31%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
5.86%

NWQIX

1D
0.05%
1M
1.22%
YTD
5.04%
6M
6.53%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
5.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POBAX vs. NWQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POBAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative
5.37%11.53%8.17%11.33%-16.92%7.64%12.39%15.64%-5.83%10.46%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.04%12.22%6.03%11.61%-13.64%4.94%5.54%18.57%-4.07%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between POBAX and NWQIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.73

The correlation between POBAX and NWQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POBAX vs. NWQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POBAX
POBAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
POBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
POBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
POBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
POBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NWQIX
NWQIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NWQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NWQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POBAX vs. NWQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POBAXNWQIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

3.98

-1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

6.38

-3.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.90

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

5.45

-2.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.88

26.06

-13.18

POBAX vs. NWQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is lower than the NWQIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POBAX and NWQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POBAXNWQIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

3.98

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.79

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.90

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.77

-0.17

Drawdowns

POBAX vs. NWQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.15%, which is greater than NWQIX's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POBAX and NWQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POBAXNWQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.15%

-23.89%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-2.94%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.39%

-4.59%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-17.75%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.33%

-23.89%

+1.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-3.01%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

0.61%

+0.53%

Volatility

POBAX vs. NWQIX - Volatility Comparison

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) at 1.22%. This indicates that POBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POBAXNWQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

1.22%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.09%

3.06%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.27%

3.86%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.40%

5.68%

+5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.88%

6.33%

+3.55%

POBAX vs. NWQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POBAX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NWQIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

POBAX vs. NWQIX - Dividend Comparison

POBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than NWQIX's 5.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.94%6.52%5.20%7.84%7.02%4.39%4.82%5.71%6.23%5.67%5.52%5.70%
POBAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative
2.90%3.06%3.68%2.67%13.64%6.84%2.56%2.31%20.06%3.22%4.32%5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


POBAX and NWQIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POBAX has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to NWQIX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POBAX dropped -29.15% vs NWQIX's -23.89%.

NWQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POBAX and NWQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer