POAHY vs. FCPGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

POAHY (Porsche Automobile Holding SE) is a stock, while FCPGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund) is Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, POAHY returned -0.22%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for FCPGX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

POAHY vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Porsche Automobile Holding SE (POAHY) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POAHY achieves a -27.07% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 25.26% return. Over the past 10 years, POAHY has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of -0.22%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.78% annualized return.

POAHY

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -9.57%
• YTD: -27.07%
• 6M: -27.52%
• 1Y: -11.48%
• 3Y*: -12.43%
• 5Y*: -18.36%
• 10Y*: -0.22%

FCPGX

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: 7.49%
• YTD: 25.26%
• 6M: 21.54%
• 1Y: 44.87%
• 3Y*: 22.87%
• 5Y*: 8.66%
• 10Y*: 15.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POAHY vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
POAHY Porsche Automobile Holding SE	-27.07%	31.31%	-22.82%	-1.56%	-40.49%	37.28%	-0.64%	29.94%	-29.01%	59.95%
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	25.26%	11.20%	20.56%	19.02%	-25.34%	10.50%	36.41%	36.31%	-4.57%	28.99%

Correlation

The correlation between POAHY and FCPGX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2009	0.44

Return for Risk

POAHY vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POAHY

POAHY Risk / Return Rank: 24
POAHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
POAHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
POAHY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
POAHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
POAHY Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FCPGX

FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POAHY vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Porsche Automobile Holding SE (POAHY) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POAHY	FCPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	2.08	-2.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	2.76	-3.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.34	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	3.52	-3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	14.02	-14.80

POAHY vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POAHY Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POAHY and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POAHY vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POAHY drawdown since its inception was -67.86%, which is greater than FCPGX's maximum drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POAHY and FCPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	POAHY	FCPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.86%	-59.11%	-8.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.81%	-13.12%	-16.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.00%	-28.69%	-12.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.21%	-39.04%	-26.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.86%	-39.04%	-28.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.04%	0.00%	-66.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.10%	-10.68%	-24.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.63%	3.28%	+11.35%

Volatility

POAHY vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Porsche Automobile Holding SE (POAHY) is 6.85%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that POAHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POAHY	FCPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.85%	7.84%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.10%	17.31%	-0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.08%	22.24%	+2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.37%	23.68%	+7.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.71%	22.94%	+10.77%

Dividends

POAHY vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

POAHY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	5.10%	6.38%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	19.27%	8.19%	5.31%	14.35%	6.88%	1.53%	4.32%
POAHY Porsche Automobile Holding SE	0.00%	4.69%	7.39%	5.50%	5.21%	2.81%	3.67%	2.17%	2.42%	2.32%	5.61%	3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POAHY and FCPGX in my portfolio?

POAHY and FCPGX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POAHY or FCPGX?

FCPGX has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to POAHY (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POAHY dropped -67.86% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.