POAHY vs. BE

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

POAHY (Porsche Automobile Holding SE) and BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) are both stocks. POAHY operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while BE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, POAHY returned -17.70%/yr vs 65.04%/yr for BE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

POAHY vs. BE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Porsche Automobile Holding SE (POAHY) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POAHY achieves a -20.54% return, which is significantly lower than BE's 248.54% return.

POAHY

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: -20.54%
• 6M: -15.39%
• 1Y: -6.52%
• 3Y*: -9.39%
• 5Y*: -17.70%
• 10Y*: -0.46%

BE

• 1D: 10.73%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 248.54%
• 6M: 188.43%
• 1Y: 1,556.73%
• 3Y*: 175.90%
• 5Y*: 65.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POAHY vs. BE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
POAHY Porsche Automobile Holding SE	-20.54%	31.31%	-22.82%	-1.56%	-40.49%	37.28%	-0.64%	29.94%	-13.65%
BE Bloom Energy Corporation	248.54%	291.22%	50.07%	-22.59%	-12.81%	-23.48%	283.67%	-25.15%	-60.08%

Correlation

The correlation between POAHY and BE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018	0.24

The correlation between POAHY and BE shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap POAHY : $11.19B BE : $96.82B
EPS POAHY : $1.05 BE : $0.02
PE Ratio POAHY : 3.49 BE : 13.19K
PS Ratio POAHY : 3.35 BE : 32.49
PB Ratio POAHY : 0.30 BE : 105.08
Total Revenue (TTM) POAHY : $2.92B BE : $2.45B
Gross Profit (TTM) POAHY : $2.92B BE : $761.91M
EBITDA (TTM) POAHY : $3.11B BE : $88.83M

Return for Risk

POAHY vs. BE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POAHY

POAHY Risk / Return Rank: 28
POAHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
POAHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
POAHY Omega Ratio Rank: 25
POAHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
POAHY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

BE

BE Risk / Return Rank: 99
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POAHY vs. BE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Porsche Automobile Holding SE (POAHY) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POAHY	BE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	14.76	-15.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	5.61	-5.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.72	-0.75
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.27	33.52	-33.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.57	106.14	-106.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POAHY vs. BE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POAHY Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the BE Sharpe Ratio of 14.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POAHY and BE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POAHY	BE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27	14.76	-15.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.57	0.76	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.40	-0.38

Drawdowns

POAHY vs. BE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POAHY drawdown since its inception was -67.86%, smaller than the maximum BE drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POAHY and BE.

Drawdown Indicators

	POAHY	BE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.86%	-92.54%	+24.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.41%	-45.94%	+18.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.00%	-53.42%	+12.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.86%	-75.87%	+8.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.00%	-1.63%	-61.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.02%	-52.09%	+17.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.16%	14.51%	-1.35%

Volatility

POAHY vs. BE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Porsche Automobile Holding SE (POAHY) is 5.91%, while Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a volatility of 25.55%. This indicates that POAHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POAHY	BE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.91%	25.55%	-19.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.47%	76.45%	-58.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.62%	106.78%	-82.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.39%	85.68%	-54.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.93%	94.94%	-61.01%

Dividends

POAHY vs. BE - Dividend Comparison

Neither POAHY nor BE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BE Bloom Energy Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POAHY Porsche Automobile Holding SE	0.00%	4.69%	7.39%	5.50%	5.21%	2.81%	3.67%	2.17%	2.42%	2.32%	5.61%	3.95%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POAHY and BE in my portfolio?

POAHY and BE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POAHY or BE?

BE has higher volatility (25.55%) compared to POAHY (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POAHY dropped -67.86% vs BE's -92.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.76 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.