PNQI vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PNQI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Internet Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. PNQI is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, PNQI returned -6.60% vs 116.49% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

PNQI vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -10.58% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 8.06% return.

PNQI

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 6.08%
• 6M: -11.13%
• YTD: -10.58%
• 1Y: -6.60%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: -1.24%
• 10Y*: 11.70%

WNTR

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 15.85%
• 6M: 10.45%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 1Y: 116.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNQI vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF	-10.58%	17.43%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	8.06%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PNQI and WNTR is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.42

Return for Risk

PNQI vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNQI

PNQI Risk / Return Rank: 6
PNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 65
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNQI vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PNQI	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	2.06	-2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	2.34	-2.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.32	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	2.60	-2.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.59	6.69	-7.28

PNQI vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNQI Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNQI and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PNQI vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PNQI	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.70%	-42.65%	-17.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.85%	-42.65%	+17.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.49%	-11.84%	-3.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.99%	-20.57%	+7.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.08%	16.58%	-4.50%

Volatility

PNQI vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) is 7.95%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that PNQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PNQI	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.95%	18.80%	-10.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.83%	47.57%	-31.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.35%	53.81%	-34.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.98%	53.62%	-26.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.32%	53.62%	-28.30%

PNQI vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

PNQI vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 104.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	104.11%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PNQI and WNTR in my portfolio?

PNQI and WNTR have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PNQI or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.80%) compared to PNQI (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, PNQI or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 116.49% vs -6.60% for PNQI. On fees, PNQI is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, PNQI has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PNQI or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 116.49% return vs -6.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PNQI or WNTR?

PNQI is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PNQI or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 104.11%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.

What is the main difference between PNQI and WNTR?

PNQI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.