PNQI vs. SPMO
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PNQI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Internet Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PNQI returned 11.73%/yr vs 21.44%/yr for SPMO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
PNQI vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -18.59% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 34.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PNQI has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 11.73%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.44% annualized return.
PNQI
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- -18.59%
- 6M
- -19.34%
- 1Y
- -13.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- -3.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
SPMO
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- YTD
- 34.38%
- 6M
- 32.02%
- 1Y
- 46.41%
- 3Y*
- 43.94%
- 5Y*
- 23.75%
- 10Y*
- 21.44%
PNQI vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -18.59% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -47.92% | -5.57% | 61.36% | 28.76% | -5.08% | 40.05% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 34.38% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and SPMO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between PNQI and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.67 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PNQI vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PNQI
SPMO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PNQI
SPMO
Communication Services
PNQI
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
PNQI
SPMO
Financial Services
PNQI
SPMO
Real Estate
PNQI
SPMO
Industrials
PNQI
SPMO
Healthcare
PNQI
SPMO
Basic Materials
PNQI
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
PNQI
-
SPMO
Energy
PNQI
-
SPMO
Utilities
PNQI
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
SPMO
PNQI vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNQI | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.41 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.67 | -4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 13.76 | -14.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -30.95% | -28.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | -12.70% | -12.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | -20.13% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | -22.74% | -36.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | -30.95% | -28.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.06% | -1.25% | -21.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.98% | -4.59% | -8.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.55% | 3.38% | +8.17% |
Volatility
PNQI vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) is 7.49%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.90%. This indicates that PNQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 11.90% | -4.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 18.07% | -2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.83% | 20.80% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 19.94% | +6.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 20.63% | +4.69% |
PNQI vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and SPMO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to PNQI (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.44% vs 11.73% for PNQI. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, PNQI has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.44% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.
PNQI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer