PNQI vs. SPIT
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PNQI is passively managed, while SPIT is actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
PNQI vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 25.12% return.
PNQI
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- 6M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 1Y
- -5.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
SPIT
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- YTD
- 25.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PNQI vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -8.93% | -3.22% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 25.12% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and SPIT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PNQI vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNQI | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -12.49% | -47.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.93% | -7.05% | -6.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.99% | -2.56% | -10.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.22% | — | — |
Volatility
PNQI vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 26.27% | -6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.00% | 26.27% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 26.27% | -0.95% |
PNQI vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.74% | 7.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and SPIT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PNQI is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PNQI is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer