PNQI vs. DGRO
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PNQI tracks the NASDAQ Internet Index while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PNQI returned 11.73%/yr vs 13.86%/yr for DGRO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
PNQI vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -18.59% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PNQI has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.73%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.
PNQI
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- -18.59%
- 6M
- -19.34%
- 1Y
- -13.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- -3.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
PNQI vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -18.59% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -47.92% | -5.57% | 61.36% | 28.76% | -5.08% | 40.05% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.70% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and DGRO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PNQI and DGRO has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PNQI vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PNQI
DGRO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PNQI
DGRO
Communication Services
PNQI
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
PNQI
DGRO
Financial Services
PNQI
DGRO
Real Estate
PNQI
DGRO
-
Industrials
PNQI
DGRO
Healthcare
PNQI
DGRO
Basic Materials
PNQI
-
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
PNQI
-
DGRO
Energy
PNQI
-
DGRO
Utilities
PNQI
-
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
DGRO
PNQI vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNQI | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.43 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.47 | -4.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 13.37 | -14.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -35.10% | -24.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | -6.47% | -18.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | -14.03% | -10.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | -19.31% | -40.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | -35.10% | -24.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.06% | -0.44% | -22.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.98% | -3.43% | -9.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.55% | 1.67% | +9.88% |
Volatility
PNQI vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.46%. This indicates that PNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 2.46% | +5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 6.92% | +8.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.83% | 9.49% | +9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 13.79% | +13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 16.59% | +8.73% |
PNQI vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and DGRO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNQI has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to DGRO (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.86% vs 11.73% for PNQI. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.
PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer