PNOPX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
PNOPX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Aug 31, 1990. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
PNOPX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PNOPX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNOPX Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund | -11.73% | 10.93% | 22.97% | 26.23% | -22.86% | 23.44% | 28.57% | 35.86% | -0.90% | -0.39% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNOPX achieves a -11.73% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
PNOPX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- -11.73%
- 6M
- -8.16%
- 1Y
- 6.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PNOPX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNOPX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PNOPX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
PNOPX
SWLGX
PNOPX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PNOPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.66 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.65 | 1.10 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.15 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 0.72 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 2.51 | -1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PNOPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.66 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.56 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.68 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between PNOPX and SWLGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PNOPX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
PNOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.71%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNOPX Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund | 12.71% | 11.22% | 9.25% | 2.96% | 8.38% | 11.69% | 7.41% | 7.14% | 20.24% | 4.91% | 0.00% | 12.64% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PNOPX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNOPX drawdown since its inception was -74.15%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNOPX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNOPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.15% | -32.69% | -41.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -16.16% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | -32.69% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -16.16% | +3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.14% | -7.13% | -17.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 4.62% | -1.03% |
Volatility
PNOPX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) is 4.34%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that PNOPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PNOPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 5.38% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 11.82% | -2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.07% | 22.31% | -4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 21.47% | -4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 22.78% | -4.67% |