PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PNOPX vs. FMIL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PNOPX and FMIL is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

PNOPX vs. FMIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.78%
7.92%
PNOPX
FMIL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PNOPX:

1.92

FMIL:

2.27

Sortino Ratio

PNOPX:

2.56

FMIL:

3.08

Omega Ratio

PNOPX:

1.36

FMIL:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

PNOPX:

1.05

FMIL:

3.40

Martin Ratio

PNOPX:

10.76

FMIL:

15.53

Ulcer Index

PNOPX:

2.37%

FMIL:

1.96%

Daily Std Dev

PNOPX:

13.30%

FMIL:

13.40%

Max Drawdown

PNOPX:

-73.96%

FMIL:

-15.87%

Current Drawdown

PNOPX:

-3.84%

FMIL:

-2.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNOPX achieves a 24.92% return, which is significantly lower than FMIL's 29.90% return.


PNOPX

YTD

24.92%

1M

-1.50%

6M

4.78%

1Y

25.51%

5Y*

7.76%

10Y*

7.44%

FMIL

YTD

29.90%

1M

-1.12%

6M

7.92%

1Y

30.44%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PNOPX vs. FMIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNOPX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FMIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
Expense ratio chart for PNOPX: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for FMIL: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PNOPX vs. FMIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PNOPX, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.922.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for PNOPX, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.563.08
The chart of Omega ratio for PNOPX, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.361.42
The chart of Calmar ratio for PNOPX, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.001.053.40
The chart of Martin ratio for PNOPX, currently valued at 10.76, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0010.7615.53
PNOPX
FMIL

The current PNOPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FMIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNOPX and FMIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.92
2.27
PNOPX
FMIL

Dividends

PNOPX vs. FMIL - Dividend Comparison

PNOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than FMIL's 0.81% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
9.11%0.18%0.00%0.48%0.30%0.33%0.06%0.50%0.00%13.21%13.23%0.22%
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
0.81%0.23%1.43%1.68%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PNOPX vs. FMIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNOPX drawdown since its inception was -73.96%, which is greater than FMIL's maximum drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNOPX and FMIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.84%
-2.63%
PNOPX
FMIL

Volatility

PNOPX vs. FMIL - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) at 3.76%. This indicates that PNOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.09%
3.76%
PNOPX
FMIL
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab