PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNOPX vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PNOPX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNOPX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 10.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PNOPX having a 15.17% annualized return and VTI not far ahead at 15.31%.


PNOPX

1D
1.39%
1M
0.84%
YTD
3.72%
6M
3.46%
1Y
18.23%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
15.17%

VTI

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.55%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.59%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNOPX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
3.72%10.93%22.97%26.23%-22.86%23.44%28.57%35.86%-0.90%29.07%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.35%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PNOPX and VTI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001

0.95

The correlation between PNOPX and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNOPX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNOPX
PNOPX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PNOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PNOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNOPX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PNOPXVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

3.06

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

13.68

-8.49

PNOPX vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNOPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNOPX and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PNOPX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNOPX drawdown since its inception was -74.15%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNOPX and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNOPXVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.15%

-55.45%

-18.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-8.92%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.90%

-19.30%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

-25.36%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.29%

-35.00%

+4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.48%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-8.01%

-15.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

1.99%

+1.53%

Volatility

PNOPX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.74%. This indicates that PNOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNOPXVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

4.74%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

9.96%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

12.76%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

17.49%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

18.35%

-0.15%

PNOPX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNOPX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PNOPX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

PNOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than VTI's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
10.81%11.22%9.25%2.96%8.38%11.69%7.41%7.14%20.24%4.91%0.00%12.64%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PNOPX and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PNOPX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to VTI (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNOPX dropped -74.15% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNOPX and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer