PNGAX vs. EFAS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS).

PNGAX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Jul 31, 1996. EFAS is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. It was launched on Nov 14, 2016.

Performance

PNGAX vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PNGAX vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund	-0.06%	34.66%	5.86%	18.50%	-6.85%	14.24%	4.19%	19.96%	-18.02%	24.09%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	10.06%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	12.75%	-5.42%	14.60%	-11.60%	22.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNGAX achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 10.06% return.

PNGAX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -9.31%
• YTD: -0.06%
• 6M: 3.35%
• 1Y: 20.85%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

EFAS

• 1D: 2.54%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 39.97%
• 3Y*: 22.57%
• 5Y*: 12.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNGAX vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNGAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

PNGAX

Putnam International Value Fund

EFAS

Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF

Return for Risk

PNGAX vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNGAX

PNGAX Risk / Return Rank: 67
PNGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PNGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
PNGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PNGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PNGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 96
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 97
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNGAX vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PNGAX	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	2.83	-1.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	3.51	-1.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.56	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	3.73	-2.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.30	17.19	-10.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PNGAX vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNGAX and EFAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PNGAX	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	2.83	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.82	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.55	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between PNGAX and EFAS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PNGAX vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

PNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than EFAS's 4.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund	2.97%	2.97%	3.89%	2.35%	1.63%	5.70%	1.84%	3.91%	4.34%	1.11%	2.23%	1.09%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.54%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PNGAX vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNGAX drawdown since its inception was -64.78%, which is greater than EFAS's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNGAX and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PNGAX	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.78%	-44.38%	-20.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	-10.52%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.37%	-28.81%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.35%	-1.59%	-7.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-7.20%	-8.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	2.28%	+0.70%

Volatility

PNGAX vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 5.52%. This indicates that PNGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PNGAX	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	5.52%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.40%	8.29%	+2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.32%	14.22%	+2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.62%	15.68%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.02%	18.45%	-1.43%