PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMNV vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMNV vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMNV achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.


PMNV

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.91%
6M
3.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMNV vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMNV and UXJL is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMNV vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMNV vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMNVUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.32

1.87

+0.45

Drawdowns

PMNV vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMNV drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMNV and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMNVUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-10.29%

+8.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.76%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-1.51%

+1.28%

Volatility

PMNV vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMNVUXJLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64%

13.90%

-11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.64%

13.90%

-11.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

13.90%

-11.26%

PMNV vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMNV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMNV vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMNV nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PMNV and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PMNV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMNV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

PMNV and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMNV and 0.85% for UXJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMNV and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer