PMNV vs. PUSH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PMNV (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November) and PUSH (PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMNV is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while PUSH is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMNV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PUSH.

Performance

PMNV vs. PUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMNV achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly higher than PUSH's 1.46% return.

PMNV

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 2.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PUSH

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 1.61%
• 1Y: 3.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMNV vs. PUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMNV PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November	2.78%	0.42%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	1.46%	0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PMNV and PUSH is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025	0.15

Return for Risk

PMNV vs. PUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMNV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PUSH

PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 88
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMNV vs. PUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMNV	PUSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.37	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.58	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.65	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.19	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.86	—

Drawdowns

PMNV vs. PUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMNV drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, which is greater than PUSH's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMNV and PUSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMNV	PUSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-0.85%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	0.00%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-0.10%	-0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PMNV	PUSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65%	1.52%	+1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.65%	1.29%	+1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.65%	1.29%	+1.36%

PMNV vs. PUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMNV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PUSH's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMNV vs. PUSH - Dividend Comparison

PMNV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PMNV PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	3.23%	3.45%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMNV and PUSH in my portfolio?

PMNV and PUSH have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMNV or PUSH?

On fees, PUSH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMNV or PUSH?

PUSH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMNV or PUSH?

PUSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.00% for PMNV.

What is the main difference between PMNV and PUSH?

PMNV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PUSH is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMNV and 0.15% for PUSH.